University College London, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, UK.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Aug;24(8):1563-72. doi: 10.1177/0956797613476046. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
Traditional approaches to human causal reasoning assume that the perception of temporal order informs judgments of causal structure. In this article, we present two experiments in which people followed the opposite inferential route: Perceptual judgments of temporal order were instead influenced by causal beliefs. By letting participants freely interact with a software-based "physics world," we induced stable causal beliefs that subsequently determined participants' reported temporal order of events, even when this led to a reversal of the objective temporal order. We argue that for short timescales, even when temporal-resolution capabilities suffice, the perception of temporal order is distorted to fit existing causal beliefs.
传统的人类因果推理方法假设,对时间顺序的感知为因果结构判断提供信息。在本文中,我们进行了两项实验,其中人们遵循相反的推理路径:对时间顺序的感知判断反而受到因果信念的影响。通过让参与者自由地与基于软件的“物理世界”进行交互,我们诱导出稳定的因果信念,随后这些信念决定了参与者对事件发生时间顺序的报告,即使这导致了客观时间顺序的反转。我们认为,在短时间尺度内,即使时间分辨率能力足够,对时间顺序的感知也会被扭曲以适应现有的因果信念。