Université de Lorraine, Psychology of Health Team, Metz, France.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Jun;34(6):425-34. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2012.759633.
This study focuses on 34 victims of aggression at the workplace, less than 48 hours following the incident of aggression. We compared victims who received an EMDR emergency protocol (URG-EMDR; n = 19) that we developed with those who received a method of intervention called eclectic therapy (n = 15). The results show that URG-EMDR therapy, provided within 48 hours, resulted in a greater decrease in perceived stress and a lower PCL-S score than eclectic therapy did. The scores were lower in both groups after 24 hours, and after 3 months, the drop was significantly greater among the victims treated with the URG-EMDR protocol; none of the EMDR-treated patients exhibited symptoms of posttraumatic stress.
这项研究关注的是 34 名在工作场所遭受攻击的受害者,他们在遭受攻击后不到 48 小时。我们将接受我们开发的 EMDR 紧急方案(URG-EMDR;n=19)的受害者与接受称为折衷疗法(eclectic therapy;n=15)的干预方法的受害者进行了比较。结果表明,在 48 小时内提供的 URG-EMDR 疗法可使感知到的压力和 PCL-S 评分降低得更多,而折衷疗法则不然。两组的分数在 24 小时后均有所下降,而在 3 个月后,接受 URG-EMDR 方案治疗的受害者的下降幅度明显更大;接受 EMDR 治疗的患者均未出现创伤后应激症状。