工作场所暴力的早期心理预防性干预：眼动脱敏再处理疗法-近期事件与重大事件应激晤谈之间的随机对照探索性比较研究
Early Psychological Preventive Intervention For Workplace Violence: A Randomized Controlled Explorative and Comparative Study Between EMDR-Recent Event and Critical Incident Stress Debriefing.
作者信息
Tarquinio Cyril, Rotonda Christine, Houllé William A, Montel Sébastien, Rydberg Jenny Ann, Minary Laetitia, Dellucci Hélène, Tarquinio Pascale, Fayard Any, Alla François
机构信息
a University of Lorraine.
b University of Paris 8.
出版信息
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Nov;37(11):787-799. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2016.1224282. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
This randomized controlled trial study aims to investigate the efficacy of an early psychological intervention called EMDR-RE compared to Critical Incident Stress Debriefing on 60 victims of workplace violence, which were divided into three groups: 'EMDR-RE' (n = 19), 'CISD' (n = 23), and 'delayed EMDR-RE' (n = 18). EMDR-RE and CISD took place 48 hours after the event, whilst third intervention was delayed by an additional 48 hours. Results showed that after 3 months PCLS and SUDS scores were significantly lower with EMDR-RE and delayed EMDR-RE compared to CISD. After 48 hours and 3 months, none of the EMDR-RE-treated victims showed PTSD symptoms.
这项随机对照试验旨在调查一种名为眼动脱敏与再处理强化疗法（EMDR-RE）的早期心理干预措施与重大事件应激晤谈（CISD）相比，对60名工作场所暴力受害者的疗效。这些受害者被分为三组：“EMDR-RE组”（n = 19）、“CISD组”（n = 23）和“延迟EMDR-RE组”（n = 18）。EMDR-RE和CISD在事件发生后48小时进行，而第三次干预则额外延迟48小时。结果显示，3个月后，与CISD相比，EMDR-RE组和延迟EMDR-RE组的创伤后应激障碍量表平民版（PCLS）得分和主观痛苦量表（SUDS）得分显著更低。在48小时和3个月后，接受EMDR-RE治疗的受害者均未出现创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）症状。
Zotero 插件