Guo Yang, Yaghmai Vahid, Salem Riad, Lewandowski Robert J, Nikolaidis Paul, Larson Andrew C, Miller Frank H
Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, NMH/Arkes Family Pavilion Suite 800, 676 N Saint Clair, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Abdom Imaging. 2013 Dec;38(6):1286-99. doi: 10.1007/s00261-013-0017-5.
Liver-directed intra-arterial therapies are palliative treatment options for patients with unresectable liver cancer; their use has also resulted in patients being downstaged leading to curative resection and transplantation. These intra-arterial therapies include transarterial embolization, conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), drug-eluting bead TACE and radioembolization. Assessment of imaging response following these liver-directed intra-arterial therapies is challenging but pivotal for patient management. Size measurements based on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been traditionally used to assess tumor response to therapy. However, these anatomic changes lag behind functional changes and may require months to occur. Further, these intra-arterial therapies cause acute tumor necrosis, which may result in a paradoxical increase in tumor size on early follow-up imaging despite complete cell death or necrosis. This concept is unique comparing to changes seen following systemic chemotherapy. The recent development of functional imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted MRI (DW MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) allow for early assessment of treatment response and even prediction of overall tumor response to intra-arterial therapies. Although the results of DW MRI and PET studies are promising, the impact of these imaging modalities to assess treatment response has been limited without standardized protocols. The aim of this review article is to delineate the best practice for assessing tumor response in patients with primary or secondary hepatic malignancies undergoing intra-arterial therapies.
肝动脉内治疗是不可切除肝癌患者的姑息性治疗选择;其应用还使患者分期降低,从而实现根治性切除和移植。这些动脉内治疗包括经动脉栓塞、传统经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)、载药微球TACE和放射性栓塞。评估这些肝动脉内治疗后的影像反应具有挑战性,但对患者管理至关重要。传统上,基于计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像(MRI)的大小测量用于评估肿瘤对治疗的反应。然而,这些解剖学变化滞后于功能变化,可能需要数月时间才会出现。此外,这些动脉内治疗会导致急性肿瘤坏死,这可能导致早期随访影像上肿瘤大小出现反常增加,尽管细胞已完全死亡或坏死。这一概念与全身化疗后的变化不同。包括扩散加权MRI(DW MRI)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在内的功能成像技术的最新发展,使得能够早期评估治疗反应,甚至预测肿瘤对动脉内治疗的总体反应。尽管DW MRI和PET研究结果很有前景,但在没有标准化方案的情况下,这些成像方式对评估治疗反应的影响有限。本文综述的目的是阐述在接受动脉内治疗的原发性或继发性肝恶性肿瘤患者中评估肿瘤反应的最佳实践。