• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Life-sustaining treatment. A legal-ethical dilemma.

作者信息

Smejkal C M, Hill F J

机构信息

St Francis Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Nurs Adm. 1990 Jul-Aug;20(7-8):49-52.

PMID:2380787
Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Cruzan by Cruzan v. Harmon will have a major impact on how we will care for patients in a persistent vegetative state. Each healthcare institution will need to review its life-sustaining treatment policies to match the guidelines established by the Supreme Court. Nurse executives also need to develop strategies to manage staff morale in coping with the conflicts surrounding the issues of preservation of life, quality of life, and patient/family choice regarding treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Life-sustaining treatment. A legal-ethical dilemma.
J Nurs Adm. 1990 Jul-Aug;20(7-8):49-52.
2
From the Office of the General Counsel. Cruzan v Director of Missouri Department of Health: an ethical and legal perspective.来自总法律顾问办公室。克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部主任案:伦理与法律视角。
JAMA. 1989 Nov 24;262(20):2928-30.
3
The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly.南希·克鲁赞女士的案例与老年人护理
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 May;38(5):588-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb02413.x.
4
The ethics of Cruzan. Families, not states, should make treatment termination decisions.
Health Prog. 1990 Oct;71(8):42-7.
5
The insane root takes reason prisoner.疯根会俘虏理智。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1989 Jan-Feb;19(1):29-31.
6
In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al.在美国最高法院。第88 - 1503号。南希·贝丝·克鲁赞,由其父母及共同监护人莱斯特·L·克鲁赞夫妇作为请愿人,诉密苏里州卫生部主任等。
Issues Law Med. 1990 Spring;5(4):453-78.
7
After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.克鲁赞案之后。美国最高法院的裁决解决了该案件,但也引发了新的问题。
Health Prog. 1990 Oct;71(8):38-41, 57.
8
The Nancy Cruzan case.南希·克鲁赞案。
Iowa Med. 1990 Mar;80(3):136.
9
Comment: the Supreme Court faces the quest of withdrawal of hydration and nutrition: Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health.评论:最高法院面临撤除水合作用与营养支持的问题:克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部案。
J Health Hosp Law. 1989 Dec;22(12):375-9.
10
[Ethical questions in the treatment of the person in persistent vegetative state. The symbolic case of Nancy Beth Cruzan].[持续性植物状态患者治疗中的伦理问题。南希·贝丝·克鲁赞的标志性案例]
Clin Ter. 2000 Jul-Aug;151(4):227-9.