• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导致采血管血液错误事件的因素:英格兰东北部一年的经验

Factors predisposing to wrong blood in tube incidents: a year's experience in the North East of England.

作者信息

Varey A, Tinegate H, Robertson J, Watson D, Iqbal A

机构信息

Transfusion Quality Co-ordinator, James Cook University Hospital , Middlesbrough, UK.

出版信息

Transfus Med. 2013 Oct;23(5):321-5. doi: 10.1111/tme.12050. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1111/tme.12050
PMID:23808358
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Wrong blood in tube (WBIT) describes a transfusion sample collected from one patient but labelled with the identification details of a different patient. These incidents have the potential to result in catastrophic harm to patients. In 2011, the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) organisation received 469 reports of WBIT across the UK.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

This was a prospective study of WBIT which collected information not only on the frequency of WBIT but also risk factors.

METHOD

All hospitals in the North East region of England submitted details of known WBITs during a 12-month period starting from July 2011, including the time of day and location where samples were taken, the job title and competency of the sample taker, and how the WBIT was identified. Where possible, the sampler was interviewed to determine reasons for the WBIT.

RESULTS

There were 48 WBITs, giving a corrected incidence of 1 : 2717 repeat transfusion samples. Doctors were responsible for 24 of 45 WBITs where the identity of the sampler was known. The rate as a proportion of samples was highest in medicine and paediatric specialties. The commonest risk factor for WBIT was labelling away from the bedside (44%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support, and add to, the data collected by SHOT. If our figures are representative of the whole of the UK, then over 1160 WBITs will occur each year, justifying SHOT's concerns that WBITs are under reported. Interventions are needed to ensure labelling of transfusion samples is always carried out at the patient's side.

摘要

引言

采血管内血液错误(WBIT)是指从一名患者采集的输血样本却贴上了另一名患者的识别信息。这些事件有可能给患者带来灾难性伤害。2011年,输血严重危害(SHOT)组织在英国收到了469例WBIT报告。

本研究的新增内容

这是一项关于WBIT的前瞻性研究,不仅收集了WBIT的发生频率信息,还收集了风险因素信息。

方法

英格兰东北部地区的所有医院提交了从2011年7月开始的12个月期间已知的WBIT详细信息,包括采血的时间和地点、采血者的职位和资质,以及WBIT是如何被识别的。在可能的情况下,对采血者进行了访谈以确定发生WBIT的原因。

结果

共有48例WBIT,校正后的发生率为每2717例重复输血样本中有1例。在已知采血者身份的45例WBIT中,医生导致了24例。按样本比例计算,发生率在医学和儿科专科中最高。WBIT最常见的风险因素是不在床边贴标签(44%)。

结论

这些发现支持了SHOT收集的数据,并对其进行了补充。如果我们的数据代表了整个英国,那么每年将发生超过1160例WBIT,这证明了SHOT对WBIT报告不足的担忧是合理的。需要采取干预措施以确保输血样本的贴标签工作始终在患者床边进行。

相似文献

1
Factors predisposing to wrong blood in tube incidents: a year's experience in the North East of England.导致采血管血液错误事件的因素:英格兰东北部一年的经验
Transfus Med. 2013 Oct;23(5):321-5. doi: 10.1111/tme.12050. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
2
Transfusion sample mislabelling and wrong blood in tube in the UK: Insights from the national comparative audits of blood transfusion in 2012 and 2022.
Transfus Med. 2025 Feb;35(1):41-47. doi: 10.1111/tme.13092. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
3
Current performance of patient sample collection in the UK.英国目前患者样本采集的情况。
Transfus Med. 2004 Apr;14(2):113-21. doi: 10.1111/j.0958-7578.2004.0488.x.
4
Electronic patient identification for sample labeling reduces wrong blood in tube errors.电子病人标识用于样本标记可减少采血管错误。
Transfusion. 2019 Mar;59(3):972-980. doi: 10.1111/trf.15102. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
5
Wrong blood in tube - potential for serious outcomes: can it be prevented?采血管内血液错误——存在严重后果的可能性:能否预防?
Br J Haematol. 2015 Jan;168(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13137. Epub 2014 Oct 4.
6
Emergency departments are higher-risk locations for wrong blood in tube errors.急诊部门是管血错误的高风险场所。
Transfusion. 2021 Sep;61(9):2601-2610. doi: 10.1111/trf.16588. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
7
Factors associated with wrong blood in tube errors: An international case series - The BEST collaborative study.与管内血错误相关的因素:一项国际病例系列研究——BEST 协作研究。
Transfusion. 2022 Jan;62(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/trf.16716. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
The immunohematologic and patient safety benefits of a centralized transfusion database.集中式输血数据库的免疫血液学和患者安全效益。
Transfusion. 2013 Apr;53(4):771-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03789.x. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
9
An international study of the performance of sample collection from patients.一项关于从患者身上采集样本操作的国际研究。
Vox Sang. 2003 Jul;85(1):40-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00313.x.
10
Where and when is blood transfused? An observational study of the timing and location of red cell transfusions in the north of England.何时何地进行输血?对英格兰北部红细胞输血时间和地点的一项观察性研究。
Vox Sang. 2007 Oct;93(3):229-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00952.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Near-miss Events of Transfusion Practice and Its Associated Factors amongst House Officers in a Teaching Hospital.教学医院住院医师输血操作险些发生事件的发生率及其相关因素
Oman Med J. 2021 Mar 31;36(2):e249. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.55. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Effectiveness of Laboratory Practices to Reducing Patient Misidentification Due to Specimen Labeling Errors at the Time of Specimen Collection in Healthcare Settings: LMBP™ Systematic Review.医疗机构标本采集时实验室操作对减少因标本标签错误导致的患者身份误认的有效性:LMBP™系统评价
J Appl Lab Med. 2017 Sep;2(2):244-258. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2017.023762.
3
The role of comprehensive check at the blood bank reception on blood requisitions in detecting potential transfusion errors.
血库接收处对用血申请进行全面检查在检测潜在输血错误方面的作用。
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2015 Jun;31(2):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s12288-014-0444-7. Epub 2014 Aug 17.