Asthma control and concordance of opinions between patients and pulmonologists.

UNLABELLED

Patient-physician opinion concordance could play a key role in asthma control. There have been no studies evaluating this association in large samples of patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine opinion concordance between asthma patients and their pulmonologists on the impact of the disease and to correlate concordance to asthma control.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional multicentre study including 1160 patients and 300 pulmonologists. Patient-physician concordance rates were assessed by two semi-structured qualitative questionnaires: (1) impact of the disease and (2) treatment satisfaction. Subsequently, participating pulmonologists determined the concordance between their perceptions and their patient's. Sociodemographic and clinical data were recorded for all patients.

RESULTS

In 53.6% of cases, asthma was controlled. The rate of patient-pulmonologist concordance on disease impact on patient daily life was 57%, with physicians underestimating the impact (compared to patients) in 26% of cases. Concordance on satisfaction with treatment was 56%, with physicians underestimating satisfaction in 26% of cases. Patient-physician discordance rates were significantly lower among patients with controlled asthma (29 and 32.1%) than those with poor control (73.7 and 73.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-pulmonologist concordance on perceptions of disease impact is low, particularly in uncontrolled asthma. This poor concordance should be addressed in education programmes, particularly for patients with uncontrolled symptoms.