• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工晶状体植入屈光力计算:针对晶状体类型的对照研究。

Intraocular lens implant power calculations: investigations controlling for lens type.

作者信息

Coburn R M, Grandon S C, Grandon G M

机构信息

Academic Computer Center, University of North Carolina, Greensboro 27412-5001.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Jul;16(4):457-64. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80799-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80799-7
PMID:2380926
Abstract

Many second generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas have recently been introduced. This study explores the performance of these formulas while controlling for a potential source of variation--the lens type. For this study, all 1,157 cases studied used the Cilco CPLU posterior chamber lens. All surgeries were performed using similar phacoemulsification techniques by only two physicians (R.M.C. and S.C.G.). The SRK, SRK II, Holladay, and Binkhorst formulas were compared among themselves and also with a piece-wise nonlinear regression formula ("best fit") developed specifically from these data by the authors. Performance of the SRK II, Holladay, and best fit were better than the older SRK and Binkhorst for most axial length ranges. For these data, the Holladay and best fit formulas performed marginally better overall than the other formulas. It was also found that manipulation of specific surgeon constants significantly affected the performance of the Binkhorst formula, but had little effect on the other formulas.

摘要

最近引入了许多第二代人工晶状体屈光度计算公式。本研究在控制一个潜在变异源——晶状体类型的同时,探讨了这些公式的性能。在本研究中,所研究的1157例病例均使用了Cilco CPLU后房型人工晶状体。所有手术均由仅两名医生(R.M.C.和S.C.G.)采用类似的超声乳化技术进行。对SRK、SRK II、霍拉迪(Holladay)和宾克霍斯特(Binkhorst)公式进行了相互比较,还与作者根据这些数据专门开发的分段非线性回归公式(“最佳拟合”)进行了比较。在大多数眼轴长度范围内,SRK II、霍拉迪和最佳拟合公式的性能优于较旧的SRK和宾克霍斯特公式。对于这些数据,霍拉迪和最佳拟合公式的总体表现略优于其他公式。还发现,特定手术医生常数的调整对宾克霍斯特公式的性能有显著影响,但对其他公式影响不大。

相似文献

1
Intraocular lens implant power calculations: investigations controlling for lens type.人工晶状体植入屈光力计算:针对晶状体类型的对照研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Jul;16(4):457-64. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80799-7.
2
Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 May;16(3):333-40. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80705-5.
3
Clinical evaluation of the Holladay and SRK II formulas.霍拉迪公式和SRK II公式的临床评估。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Jan;16(1):71-4. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80877-2.
4
Discrepancies between intraocular lens implant power prediction formulas in pediatric patients.小儿患者人工晶状体植入屈光力预测公式之间的差异。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Feb;114(2):383-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.063.
5
Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula in patients with normal axial length.前房深度对眼轴长度正常患者人工晶状体计算公式选择的影响
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct-Dec;21(4):307-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.142266.
6
[Intraocular lens power calculation for high myopic eyes with cataract: comparison of three formulas].[白内障高度近视眼人工晶状体屈光度计算:三种公式的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 11;53(4):260-265. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.04.007.
7
Intraocular lens power calculation using the IOLMaster and various formulas in eyes with long axial length.使用IOLMaster及多种公式计算眼轴长度较长的眼睛的人工晶状体度数
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Feb;34(2):262-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.017.
8
Comparison of the SRK/T formula and other theoretical and regression formulas.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 May;16(3):341-6. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80706-7.
9
SRK II formula in the calculation of intraocular lens power.用于计算人工晶状体度数的SRK II公式。
Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Oct;73(10):823-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.73.10.823.
10
[Intraocular lens power calculation for short eye].
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1995 Oct;99(10):1186-9.