Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
Contraception. 2013 Nov;88(5):629-35. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 May 29.
Little is known regarding clinicians' attitudes about or the extent to which the recommendation to offer same-day insertions for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is applied in practice.
Since 2006, 47 family planning agencies in Colorado and Iowa participated in two initiatives to reduce unintended pregnancy by increasing LARC provision. Clinic directors (n = 45) and clinicians (n = 114) participating in these initiatives were interviewed and surveyed regarding their LARC provision practices and attitudes.
Agencies required fewer visits for the contraceptive implant than for the intrauterine device (IUD). Only 18% of agencies typically offered an IUD, and 36% typically offered an implant in one visit. Years of experience and professional title significantly predicted attitudes about the number of visits required to get LARC.
Barriers must be overcome for full implementation of professional LARC guidelines and for more women to receive chosen methods without the extra burden of multiple visits.
对于临床医生对长效可逆避孕措施(LARC)建议当日放置的态度或实际应用程度,人们知之甚少。
自 2006 年以来,科罗拉多州和爱荷华州的 47 家计划生育机构参与了两项计划,旨在通过增加 LARC 的提供来减少意外怀孕。参与这些计划的诊所主任(n=45)和临床医生(n=114)接受了关于其 LARC 提供实践和态度的采访和调查。
机构对避孕药具植入的需求比宫内节育器(IUD)要少。只有 18%的机构通常提供 IUD,而 36%的机构通常在一次就诊中提供植入物。从业年限和职称显著预测了对获得 LARC 所需就诊次数的态度。
必须克服障碍,以全面实施专业 LARC 指南,并使更多女性在不增加多次就诊负担的情况下选择自己想要的方法。