Sarath Babu D, Ranganayakulu K P, Rajasekhar D, Vanajakshamma V, Pramod Kumar T
Senior Resident, Department of Cardiology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati 517507, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Indian Heart J. 2013 May-Jun;65(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.04.022. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
Balloon mitral valvotomy (BMV) is a safe and an effective treatment in patients with symptomatic rheumatic mitral stenosis. This study was conducted to validate the importance of assessing the morphology of mitral valve commissures by transoesophageal echocardiography and thereby predicting the outcome after balloon mitral valvotomy [BMV].
Study consisted of 100 patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis undergoing BMV. The Commissural Morphology and Wilkins score were assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography. Both the commissures (anterolateral and posteromedial) were scored individually according to whether non-calcified fusion was absent (0), partial (1), or extensive (2) and calcification (score 0) and combined giving an overall commissural score of 0-4. Outcome of BMV was correlated with commissural score and Wilkins score.
The commissural score and outcome after BMV correlated significantly. 66 of 70 patients (94%) with a commissural score of 3-4 obtained a good outcome compared with only six (20%) patients of 30 with a commissural score of 0-2 (positive and negative predictive accuracy 94% and 80%, respectively, p < 0.001). Increase in 2DMVA post BMV was more in patients with higher commissural score (score of 3-4). Wilkins score <8 usually predicts a good outcome but even in patients with Wilkins score >8 a commissural score >2 predicts a 50% chance of a good result.
A higher commissural score predicts a good outcome after BMV hence it can be concluded that along with Wilkins score, commissural morphology and score should be assessed with TOE in patients undergoing BMV.
球囊二尖瓣成形术(BMV)是有症状的风湿性二尖瓣狭窄患者的一种安全有效的治疗方法。本研究旨在验证经食管超声心动图评估二尖瓣瓣叶交界形态的重要性,并据此预测球囊二尖瓣成形术(BMV)后的结果。
研究包括100例接受BMV的有症状二尖瓣狭窄患者。通过经食管超声心动图评估瓣叶交界形态和威尔金斯评分。两个瓣叶交界(前外侧和后内侧)根据无钙化融合(0分)、部分融合(1分)或广泛融合(2分)以及钙化情况(0分)分别评分,综合得出瓣叶交界总分0 - 4分。BMV的结果与瓣叶交界评分和威尔金斯评分相关。
BMV后的瓣叶交界评分与结果显著相关。70例瓣叶交界评分为3 - 4分的患者中有66例(94%)取得了良好的结果,而30例瓣叶交界评分为0 - 2分的患者中只有6例(20%)取得了良好的结果(阳性和阴性预测准确率分别为94%和80%,p < 0.001)。BMV后2DMVA增加在瓣叶交界评分较高(3 - 4分)的患者中更为明显。威尔金斯评分<8通常预示良好的结果,但即使在威尔金斯评分>8的患者中,瓣叶交界评分>2预示有50%取得良好结果的机会。
较高的瓣叶交界评分预示BMV后有良好的结果,因此可以得出结论,在接受BMV的患者中,除了威尔金斯评分外,还应使用经食管超声心动图评估瓣叶交界形态和评分。