Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98195-6310, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;96(2):445-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.033. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
Large series reporting outcomes for penetrating thoracic trauma have identified injury pattern and injury severity scoring as predictors of poor outcome. However, the impact of surgical expertise on patient outcomes has not been previously investigated. We sought to determine how often board-certified cardiothoracic surgeons are utilized for operative thoracic trauma and whether this has an effect on patient outcomes.
A level I trauma center registry was queried between 2003 and 2011. Records of patients undergoing surgery as a result of penetrating thoracic trauma were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, injuries, injury severity, utilization of a cardiothoracic surgical operative consult and outcomes were recorded. Patients operated on by cardiothoracic surgeons were compared with patients operated on by trauma surgeons using stepwise multivariate analyses to determine the factors associated with utilization of cardiothoracic surgeons for operative thoracic trauma and survival.
Cardiothoracic surgeons were used in 73.0% of cases (162 of 222) over the study period. The use of cardiothoracic surgeons increased incrementally both overall (38.5% to 73.9%), and for emergent/urgent cases (31.8% to 73.3%). When comparing patients undergoing operation on an emergent/urgent basis by cardiothoracic versus trauma surgeons, there was no significant difference with regard to demographics, mechanism of injury, injury severity scoring, or surgical morbidity. Stepwise logistic regression showed the presence of a cardiothoracic surgeon to be independently associated with survival (odds ratio 4.70; p = 0.019).
Use of cardiothoracic surgeons for operative thoracic trauma increased over the study period. Outcomes for severely injured patients with elevated chest injury scores or decreased revised trauma scores may be improved with appropriate operative consultation with a board-certified cardiothoracic surgeon.
大量报告穿透性胸部创伤结果的系列研究已经确定了损伤模式和损伤严重程度评分是不良预后的预测因素。然而,外科专业知识对患者预后的影响尚未得到研究。我们试图确定胸心外科医生在多大程度上被用于手术治疗胸部创伤,以及这是否对患者预后产生影响。
查询了一个 I 级创伤中心的注册中心,检索时间为 2003 年至 2011 年。回顾性分析因穿透性胸部创伤而接受手术治疗的患者记录。记录患者的人口统计学资料、损伤、损伤严重程度、胸心外科手术咨询的利用情况以及结果。对接受胸心外科医生手术的患者与接受创伤外科医生手术的患者进行了逐步多元分析,以确定与胸心外科医生用于手术治疗胸部创伤和生存相关的因素。
在研究期间,胸心外科医生在 73.0%的病例(222 例中有 162 例)中使用。胸心外科医生的使用总体上呈递增趋势(从 38.5%增加到 73.9%),急诊/紧急病例的使用也呈递增趋势(从 31.8%增加到 73.3%)。当比较紧急/紧急情况下由胸心外科医生与创伤外科医生进行手术的患者时,在人口统计学、损伤机制、损伤严重程度评分或手术发病率方面没有显著差异。逐步逻辑回归显示,存在胸心外科医生与生存率独立相关(优势比 4.70;p=0.019)。
在研究期间,胸心外科医生用于手术治疗胸部创伤的使用有所增加。对于胸部损伤评分较高或修订创伤评分较低的严重受伤患者,通过与胸心外科医生进行适当的手术咨询,可能会改善其预后。