Institut de Recherche en Psychologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
Brain Cogn. 2013 Aug;82(3):344-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
Numerous studies have shown an exacerbation of attentional bias towards threat in anxiety states. However, the cognitive mechanisms responsible for these attentional biases remain largely unknown. Further, the authors outline the need to consider the nature of the attentional processes in operation (hypervigilance, avoidance, or disengagement). We adapted a dot-probe paradigm to record behavioral and electrophysiological responses in 26 participants reporting high or low fear of evaluation, a major component of social anxiety. Pairs of faces including a neutral and an emotional face (displaying anger, fear, disgust, or happiness) were presented during 200 ms and then replaced by a neutral target to discriminate. Results show that anxious participants were characterized by an increased P1 in response to pairs of faces, irrespective of the emotional expression included in the pair. They also showed an increased P2 in response to angry-neutral pairs selectively. Finally, in anxious participants, the P1 response to targets was enhanced when replacing emotional faces, whereas non-anxious subjects showed no difference between the two conditions. These results indicate an early hypervigilance to face stimuli in social anxiety, coupled with difficulty in disengaging from threat and sustained attention to emotional stimuli. They are discussed within the framework of current models of anxiety and psychopathology.
许多研究表明,在焦虑状态下,人们对威胁的注意力偏向会加剧。然而,导致这些注意力偏差的认知机制在很大程度上仍不清楚。此外,作者还概述了需要考虑正在进行的注意力过程的性质(过度警惕、回避或脱离)。我们采用点探测范式,在 26 名报告高度或低度评价恐惧的参与者(社交焦虑的主要组成部分)中记录行为和电生理反应。在 200 毫秒内呈现包括中性和情绪面孔(显示愤怒、恐惧、厌恶或快乐)的面孔对,然后用中性目标替换以进行区分。结果表明,焦虑参与者的特征是对面孔对的 P1 增加,而不论面孔对中包含的情绪表达如何。他们还表现出对愤怒-中性面孔对的 P2 增加,具有选择性。最后,在焦虑参与者中,当用情绪面孔替换目标时,P1 对目标的反应增强,而非焦虑组在两种情况下没有差异。这些结果表明,在社交焦虑中存在对面孔刺激的早期过度警惕,以及难以脱离威胁和对情绪刺激的持续关注。它们在焦虑和精神病理学的现有模型框架内进行了讨论。