Suppr超能文献

正常年轻成年说话者习惯性与推导得出的最佳嗓音基频值的比较。

A comparison of habitual and derived optimal voice fundamental frequency values in normal young adult speakers.

作者信息

Britto A I, Doyle P C

机构信息

Vocal Function Laboratory, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1990 Aug;55(3):476-84. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5503.476.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare habitual (modal) and derived optimal pitch (fundamental frequency) values in 40 young adults. The individual habitual F0 values of 20 male and 20 female nonsmokers with normal larynges, normal voices, and no history of laryngeal pathology or formal vocal training were obtained from high-quality recordings of spontaneous monologue, oral reading, and sustained phonation. Optimal fundamental frequency (F0) was derived from each individual's phonational range using the 25% Method (Fairbanks, 1960; Pronovost, 1942). Using correlative analyses, the predicted optimal F0 values that were derived were compared to habitual F0 values for the male and female speaker groups, and for specific vocal tasks used to identify habitual F0 (i.e., spontaneous monologue vs. oral reading vs. sustained phonation). Results indicate that habitual F0 was not consistent with derived optimal F0 values using the 25% Method; rather, habitual F0 in our normal adults occurred between 8% and 10% up the phonational range from basal F0. Clinical implications of these data and the related limitations associated with the concept of optimal pitch (F0) are discussed.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较40名年轻成年人的习惯性(模态)音高和推导得出的最佳音高(基频)值。从20名男性和20名女性非吸烟者的高质量自发独白、口头朗读和持续发声录音中获取其个体习惯性F0值,这些人喉部正常、嗓音正常,无喉部疾病史或正规发声训练经历。使用25%方法(费尔班克斯,1960年;普罗诺沃斯特,1942年)从每个人的发声范围中推导得出最佳基频(F0)。通过相关性分析,将推导得出的预测最佳F0值与男性和女性说话者组的习惯性F0值进行比较,并与用于确定习惯性F0的特定发声任务(即自发独白与口头朗读与持续发声)进行比较。结果表明,习惯性F0与使用25%方法推导得出的最佳F0值不一致;相反,在我们的正常成年人中,习惯性F0出现在从基础F0起发声范围的8%至10%之间。讨论了这些数据的临床意义以及与最佳音高(F0)概念相关的局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验