• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究阿巴西普在类风湿关节炎治疗中的价值:成本效益研究的系统评价

Investigating the value of abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies.

作者信息

Athanasakis Kostas, Petrakis Ioannis, Kyriopoulos John

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, National School of Public Health, 196 Alexandras Avenue, 11521 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

ISRN Rheumatol. 2013 May 30;2013:256871. doi: 10.1155/2013/256871. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1155/2013/256871
PMID:23819062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3683476/
Abstract

Background. Rheumatoid arthritis is a progressive inflammatory disease that affects greatly patients' quality of life and demands for aggressive management early on during the course of the disease. The discovery of biologics has equipped rheumatologists with evolutionary treatment tools but has also impacted greatly management costs. Objectives. To conduct a systematic review in order to evaluate the cost effectiveness of abatacept in the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Methods. Pubmed, the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Outcomes Research Digest, the National Health System Economic Evaluation Database, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched. Results. In total 301 studies were identified and 42 met the inclusion criteria. Half of the selected studies evaluated abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, after failure of or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors. Of those, 82% were in favor of abatacept as a cost-effective or dominant strategy versus varying alternatives, whereas 18% favored other treatments. Conclusion. The majority of evidence from the published literature supports that abatacept can be a cost-effective alternative in the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis, especially in patients that have demonstrated inadequate response or intolerance to anti-TNF agents or conventional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.

摘要

背景。类风湿性关节炎是一种进行性炎症性疾病,极大地影响患者的生活质量,需要在疾病过程早期进行积极管理。生物制剂的发现为风湿病学家提供了革命性的治疗工具,但也极大地影响了管理成本。目的。进行一项系统评价,以评估阿巴西普治疗中重度类风湿性关节炎的成本效益。方法。检索了PubMed、国际药物经济学和结果研究学会结果研究文摘、国家卫生系统经济评价数据库以及循证医学数据库。结果。共识别出301项研究,42项符合纳入标准。所选研究中有一半评估了阿巴西普在肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂治疗失败或不耐受后用于治疗类风湿性关节炎的情况。其中,82%的研究支持阿巴西普作为一种具有成本效益或主导性的策略,优于各种替代方案,而18%的研究支持其他治疗方法。结论。已发表文献中的大多数证据支持,阿巴西普在治疗中重度类风湿性关节炎方面可能是一种具有成本效益的替代方案,尤其是在对抗肿瘤坏死因子药物或传统改善病情抗风湿药物反应不足或不耐受的患者中。

相似文献

1
Investigating the value of abatacept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies.探究阿巴西普在类风湿关节炎治疗中的价值:成本效益研究的系统评价
ISRN Rheumatol. 2013 May 30;2013:256871. doi: 10.1155/2013/256871. Print 2013.
2
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
3
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗和阿巴西普治疗肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Mar;15(14):1-278. doi: 10.3310/hta15140.
4
Alternative tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or abatacept or rituximab following failure of initial TNFi in rheumatoid arthritis: the SWITCH RCT.类风湿关节炎初始 TNFi 治疗失败后应用替代肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)或阿巴西普或利妥昔单抗:SWITCH RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jun;22(34):1-280. doi: 10.3310/hta22340.
5
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, tocilizumab and TNF-inhibitors compared with rituximab as second-line biologic drug in rheumatoid arthritis.阿巴西普、托珠单抗和 TNF 抑制剂与利妥昔单抗作为类风湿关节炎二线生物药物的成本效益比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0220142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220142. eCollection 2019.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿巴西普、阿达木单抗、依那西普和托珠单抗治疗幼年特发性关节炎的临床有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(34):1-222. doi: 10.3310/hta20340.
7
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.
8
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of biologic agents for the management of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in anti-TNF inadequate responders in Italy: a modelling approach.评估生物制剂在意大利抗 TNF 应答不足的中重度类风湿关节炎患者中的成本效益:一种建模方法。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):633-41. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
9
10
Cost-effectiveness modeling of abatacept versus other biologic agents in DMARDS and anti-TNF inadequate responders for the management of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.在治疗中度至重度类风湿关节炎的抗风湿药物(DMARDs)和抗肿瘤坏死因子(anti-TNF)治疗反应不足的患者中,阿巴西普与其他生物制剂的成本效益建模。
Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Apr;28(4):403-12. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-1060-4. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Abatacept: A Review in Rheumatoid Arthritis.阿巴西普:类风湿关节炎的治疗药物。
Drugs. 2017 Jul;77(11):1221-1233. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0775-4.
2
Cost-effectiveness of abatacept, rituximab, and TNFi treatment after previous failure with TNFi treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial.类风湿关节炎患者此前使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗失败后,阿巴西普、利妥昔单抗及TNFi治疗的成本效益:一项实用多中心随机试验
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 May 22;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0630-5.
3
Update on the use of systemic biologic agents in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis.全身生物制剂在非感染性葡萄膜炎治疗中的应用进展
Biologics. 2014 Feb 15;8:67-81. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S41477. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Abatacept or infliximab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: an Italian trial-based and real-life cost-consequence analysis.阿巴西普或英夫利昔单抗治疗甲氨蝶呤治疗应答不佳的类风湿关节炎患者:一项意大利基于试验和真实世界的成本-效果分析。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Jul-Aug;31(4):575-83. Epub 2013 May 27.
2
Cost per responder associated with biologic therapies for Crohn's disease, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis.与克罗恩病、银屑病和类风湿关节炎的生物治疗相关的应答者成本。
Adv Ther. 2012 Jul;29(7):620-34. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0035-7. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
3
Cost-effectiveness modelling of sequential biologic strategies for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in Finland.芬兰中重度类风湿关节炎序贯生物制剂治疗策略的成本效益建模
Open Rheumatol J. 2012;6:38-43. doi: 10.2174/1874312901206010038. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
4
Use of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis.阿巴西普在类风湿关节炎中的应用。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 May 11;142:w13581. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13581. eCollection 2012.
5
Biologic agents for rheumatoid arthritis--negotiating the NICE technology appraisals.类风湿关节炎的生物制剂——协商 NICE 技术评估。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jan;51(1):24-31. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker321. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
6
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of biologic agents for the management of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in anti-TNF inadequate responders in Italy: a modelling approach.评估生物制剂在意大利抗 TNF 应答不足的中重度类风湿关节炎患者中的成本效益:一种建模方法。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):633-41. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
7
Modelling cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments based on disease activity scores for the management of rheumatoid arthritis in Spain.基于疾病活动评分对西班牙类风湿性关节炎治疗中生物制剂治疗的成本效益进行建模。
Int J Inflam. 2011;2011:727634. doi: 10.4061/2011/727634. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
8
Analysis of drug and administrative costs allowed by U.S. Private and public third-party payers for 3 intravenous biologic agents for rheumatoid arthritis.美国私人和公共第三方支付者对3种类风湿关节炎静脉注射生物制剂的药物及管理成本分析。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 May;17(4):313-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.4.313.
9
Access to biologic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries.中东欧国家类风湿关节炎的生物治疗途径。
Med Sci Monit. 2011 Apr;17(4):SR1-13. doi: 10.12659/msm.881697.
10
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗和阿巴西普治疗肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Mar;15(14):1-278. doi: 10.3310/hta15140.