Thorsen R, Binda L, Chiaramonte S, Dalla Costa D, Redaelli T, Occhi E, Beghi E, Ferrarin M
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy -
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Feb;50(1):31-8. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
Few epidemiological data are available regarding distribution of cervical spinal cord injury with respect to level of lesion and the relationship between the neurological level of lesion and residual hand function. Such data are important to evaluate the relevance of innovative therapeutic approaches, and to plan prospective clinical trials.
To examine the frequency distribution of neurological level of lesion and to investigate the correlation among level, active muscles in the arm and the relation to hand function.
Cross-sectional study.
Two spinal units in the Lombardy region of Italy.
Patients with cervical spinal cord lesion.
Consecutive records, taken from an 8-year interval of admission to either spinal unit, of patients with a cervical spinal cord lesion were examined, and individuals with a C5 to C7 neurological level of lesion were called in for clinical examination. The arm muscles were evaluated according to the International Classification for Surgery of the Hand in Tetraplegia (ICSHT), and hand function was tested with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). A correlation analysis was made of the ICSHT, ARAT and neurological level of lesion.
In 253 clinical records we found the most frequent lesions to be C5 (21%), C6 (31%) and C7 (21%); 76 of these patients were enrolled for a clinical evaluation. Both ICSHT (Spearmans' rho=0.6; P<0.001) and ARAT (rho=0.2; P<0.05) were poorly correlated with the neurological level of lesion. ARAT was also poorly correlated with the ICSHT group (rho=0.5; P<0.001).
Our study suggests that 73% of tetraplegic subjects have a neurological level of lesion between C5 and C7, and that it is not possible to accurately predict residual hand function from the level of lesion obtained from the clinical records, or from an ICSHT evaluation.
The results of our work show that a large number of patients with cervical spinal cord lesion have impaired hand function. Residual hand function must be assessed with specific functional tests; it cannot be derived simply from a lesion's neurological level.
关于颈脊髓损伤在损伤平面的分布以及损伤神经平面与手部残余功能之间的关系,现有的流行病学数据较少。这些数据对于评估创新治疗方法的相关性以及规划前瞻性临床试验非常重要。
研究损伤神经平面的频率分布,并探讨损伤平面、上肢主动肌之间的相关性以及与手部功能的关系。
横断面研究。
意大利伦巴第地区的两个脊髓治疗单元。
颈脊髓损伤患者。
对两个脊髓治疗单元8年间收治的颈脊髓损伤患者的连续记录进行检查,将损伤神经平面为C5至C7的患者召集进行临床检查。根据《四肢瘫手部手术国际分类》(ICSHT)评估上肢肌肉,并使用动作研究臂测试(ARAT)测试手部功能。对ICSHT、ARAT和损伤神经平面进行相关性分析。
在253份临床记录中,我们发现最常见的损伤平面为C5(21%)、C6(31%)和C7(21%);其中76例患者纳入临床评估。ICSHT(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数rho = 0.6;P < 0.001)和ARAT(rho = 0.2;P < 0.05)与损伤神经平面的相关性均较差。ARAT与ICSHT组的相关性也较差(rho = 0.5;P < 0.001)。
我们的研究表明,73%的四肢瘫患者损伤神经平面在C5至C7之间,并且无法根据临床记录获得的损伤平面或ICSHT评估准确预测手部残余功能。
我们的研究结果表明,大量颈脊髓损伤患者存在手部功能障碍。必须通过特定的功能测试评估手部残余功能;不能仅从损伤的神经平面得出。