Knopf Hildtraud, Wolf Ingrid-Katharina, Sarganas Giselle, Zhuang Wanli, Rascher Wolfgang, Neubert Antje
Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, General-Pape-Str, 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 3;13:631. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-631.
Population-based self-reported data on off-label medicine use independent from health care provisions are lacking. The purpose of this study is to investigate off-label medicine use in children and adolescents in Germany in a non-clinical setting and to identify prevalence, determinants and spectrum of off-label medicine use.
Data were obtained from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS) conducted by the Robert Koch Institute (2003-2006). 17,450 randomly selected children aged 0-17 years took part in the drug interviews. Of those, 8,899 took at least one medicine during the 7 days preceding the interview. Off-label medicine use was defined as the discrepancy between actual use and the intended use described in the summary of product characteristics. Off-label medicine use was stratified into off-label indication, off-label age, off-label over-dosing, and off-label under-dosing.
The prevalence rate of off-label medicine use among those who used medicines amount of is 40.2%. The prevalence rate is significantly higher in boys (41.4%), in children aged 3 to 6 years (48.7%), without migration background (40.9%), with high social status (42.5%), living in small (42.0%) and medium sized cities (41.6%), and with a poor parents rated health status (41.7%). 12,667 preparations (attributable in respect to off-label use) were taken by 8,899 children. 30% of the medicines have been used off-label. Off-label medicine use was highest in preparations of the ATC-class "C00 Cardiovascular System". In all origins of medicine, all age groups and all ATC-classes under-dosing was the most frequent reason for off-label medicine use.
There is a considerable level of self-reported off-label medicines use in the general paediatric population. Further investigations are needed to examine in how far off-label medicine use is based on lack of knowledge or on empiricism in paediatric pharmacotherapy. Attention also needs to be paid to under-dosing which potentially exposes drug users to risks of side effects without the benefit of a therapeutic effect. Clinical trials for licensing of paediatric medicines, education of health care professionals, but also of parents and carers are needed to ensure the rational use of medicines.
缺乏基于人群的、独立于医疗保健服务的非标签用药自我报告数据。本研究的目的是调查德国儿童和青少年在非临床环境中的非标签用药情况,并确定非标签用药的患病率、决定因素和范围。
数据来自罗伯特·科赫研究所进行的德国儿童和青少年健康访谈与检查调查(KiGGS,2003 - 2006年)。17450名随机抽取的0至17岁儿童参与了药物访谈。其中,8899名儿童在访谈前7天内至少服用了一种药物。非标签用药定义为实际用药与产品特性摘要中描述的预期用药之间的差异。非标签用药分为非标签适应症、非标签年龄、非标签过量用药和非标签不足用药。
用药儿童中非标签用药的患病率为40.2%。男孩(41.4%)、3至6岁儿童(48.7%)、无移民背景儿童(40.9%)、社会地位高的儿童(42.5%)、居住在小城市(42.0%)和中等城市(41.6%)以及父母健康状况评价较差的儿童(41.7%)的患病率显著更高。8899名儿童服用了12667种(归因于非标签使用)制剂。30%的药物存在非标签使用情况。非标签用药在ATC分类“C00心血管系统”的制剂中最为常见。在所有药物来源、所有年龄组和所有ATC分类中,不足用药是最常见的非标签用药原因。
在一般儿科人群中,自我报告的非标签用药水平相当高。需要进一步调查非标签用药在多大程度上是基于儿科药物治疗知识的缺乏或经验主义。还需要关注不足用药情况,这可能使药物使用者在未获得治疗效果益处的情况下面临副作用风险。需要进行儿科药物许可临床试验,对医疗保健专业人员以及父母和护理人员进行教育,以确保合理用药。