University of Iceland, Iceland.
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Nov;22(8):927-40. doi: 10.1177/0963662512449598. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
Using the example of the sociological analysis of biological citizenship and literacy, it is argued that a merely descriptive analysis of these phenomena does not capture their distinctive normative features. While such a description realistically demonstrates how citizens respond to and are shaped by biotechnology and biomedical discourse, it provides no critique of the forces moulding the citizen-consumer. Ideas of active citizenship fuel the search for forms of public engagement in the spirit of deliberative democracy. While these attempts are guided by an important vision of policy making in democratic society, they are beset with several practical difficulties. It is argued that the discussion of deliberative practices has focused too much on direct participation of citizens in various dialogical events and its impact on policy and decision making. This approach ignores other important aspects of deliberative democratic theory, emphasizing public accountability and trustworthiness of democratic institutions.
以对生物公民身份和素养的社会学分析为例,文中指出,对这些现象的简单描述分析无法捕捉到它们独特的规范性特征。虽然这种描述真实地展示了公民如何对生物技术和生物医学话语做出反应并受其影响,但它没有对塑造公民-消费者的力量进行批判。积极公民的理念推动了在审议式民主精神下寻求公众参与的形式。虽然这些尝试以民主社会中重要的政策制定愿景为指导,但它们也面临着几个实际困难。文中认为,对审议实践的讨论过于关注公民在各种对话性事件中的直接参与及其对政策和决策制定的影响。这种方法忽略了审议民主理论的其他重要方面,强调了民主制度的公共问责制和可信度。