Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, University of Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2013 Apr-Jun;27(2):399-408.
S6K1 regulation associates a central role with dynamics of sequential phosphorylations at the hydrophobic motif (T412) and activation loop (T252) of the enzyme, such that the hydrophobic motif phosphorylation supposedly brought about by mTOR- kinase, primes the enzyme for PDK1 dependent phosphorylation at the activation loop for its full activation. Accordingly loss of hydrophobic motif phosphorylation attributed to TOR- kinase inhibition, with resultant loss of activation loop phosphorylation is the hypothesis put forward to explain the mechanism of rapamycin inhibition. Our recent observation that rapamycin continues to inhibit S6K1 in the absence of either phosphorylation, together with the evidence that phosphorylation at activation loop may occur prior to that of hydrophobic motif raises serious questions about the proposed mechanism of rapamycin inhibition. Here, we show that rapamycin fails to effect preferential loss of either phosphorylation and the two instead exhibit equal sensitivity to rapamycin both in time and quantum. We further show that of activation loop and hydrophobic motif phosphorylations turnover in an interdependent manner so as to exhibit all or none pattern of loss to rapamycin. Using insect cell expression system, we further substantiate their interdependent turnover and provide evidence that the two phosphorylations are brought about in a coordinate and not sequential manner. These data together with the observation that both kinases that cause hydrophobic motif and activation loop phosphorylations in insect or mammalian cells are completely insensitive to inhibition by rapamycin, suggest that their loss is a consequence and not the mechanism of rapamycin inhibition in accordance with the model proposed herein.
S6K1 的调节作用与酶的疏水性基序(T412)和激活环(T252)的顺序磷酸化动力学密切相关,因此,mTOR 激酶引起的疏水性基序磷酸化据称使酶为 PDK1 依赖性磷酸化做好准备,从而使其完全激活。因此,归因于 TOR 激酶抑制的疏水性基序磷酸化的丧失,以及随之而来的激活环磷酸化的丧失,是解释雷帕霉素抑制机制的假说。我们最近的观察结果表明,即使在没有任何磷酸化的情况下,雷帕霉素仍然可以继续抑制 S6K1,并且有证据表明激活环的磷酸化可能先于疏水性基序的磷酸化发生,这对雷帕霉素抑制的拟议机制提出了严重质疑。在这里,我们表明雷帕霉素不能有效地优先丧失任一种磷酸化,并且这两种磷酸化在时间和量子上对雷帕霉素都具有同等的敏感性。我们进一步表明,激活环和疏水性基序磷酸化的周转率相互依赖,因此表现出对雷帕霉素的全部或无损失模式。使用昆虫细胞表达系统,我们进一步证实了它们的相互依赖性,并提供了证据表明,这两种磷酸化是协调发生的,而不是顺序发生的。这些数据以及在昆虫或哺乳动物细胞中引起疏水性基序和激活环磷酸化的两种激酶完全不受雷帕霉素抑制的观察结果表明,它们的丧失是雷帕霉素抑制的结果,而不是其机制,这符合本文提出的模型。