• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Provider dismissal policies and clustering of vaccine-hesitant families: an agent-based modeling approach.提供者解雇政策和疫苗犹豫家庭的聚类:基于代理的建模方法。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Aug;9(8):1819-24. doi: 10.4161/hv.25635. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
2
Provider dismissal of vaccine-hesitant families: misguided policy that fails to benefit children.医疗服务提供者拒绝为犹豫不决的疫苗接种家庭提供服务:这项政策有误,无益于儿童健康。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Dec;9(12):2661-2. doi: 10.4161/hv.26284. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
3
"Model" patients and the consequences of provider responses to vaccine hesitancy.“模范”患者与提供者对疫苗犹豫反应的后果。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Dec;9(12):2663-5. doi: 10.4161/hv.26371. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
4
Vaccine Hesitancy: Where We Are and Where We Are Going.疫苗犹豫:我们所处的位置与前进的方向
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1550-1562. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Influences on Immunization Decision-Making among US Parents of Young Children.美国幼儿家长免疫接种决策的影响因素
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Dec;21(12):2178-2187. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2336-6.
6
Practical approaches to vaccine hesitancy issues in the United States: 2013.美国疫苗犹豫问题的实用方法:2013 年。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Dec;9(12):2654-7. doi: 10.4161/hv.26783. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
7
Variations in reason for intention not to vaccinate across time, region, and by race/ethnicity, NIS-Teen (2008-2016).不同时间、地区和种族/族裔之间接种意愿的原因变化,NIS-Teen(2008-2016)。
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 21;37(4):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.017. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Vaccine Hesitancy: Causes, Consequences, and a Call to Action.疫苗犹豫:原因、后果及行动呼吁
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6 Suppl 4):S391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
9
Vaccine Hesitancy in Pediatric Primary Care Practices.儿科初级保健中疫苗犹豫的现象。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Nov;28(13):2071-2080. doi: 10.1177/1049732318782164. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Dismissal policies for vaccine refusal among US physicians: a literature review.美国医生中疫苗拒绝的解雇政策:文献综述。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 May 3;16(5):1189-1193. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1724742. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
An Informed Approach to Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake in Children.一种针对儿童疫苗犹豫和疫苗接种情况的明智方法。
Dela J Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;8(1):60-64. doi: 10.32481/djph.2022.03.009. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Considering a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for pediatric kidney transplant candidates. 考虑对儿科肾移植候选人实施 COVID-19 疫苗强制接种。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2022 Nov;37(11):2559-2569. doi: 10.1007/s00467-022-05511-7. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
3
Caring for the Vaccine-Hesitant Family: Evidence-Based Alternatives to Dismissal.关爱对疫苗持犹豫态度的家庭:基于证据的替代摒弃方法
J Pediatr. 2020 Sep;224:137-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.05.029. Epub 2020 May 22.
4
A qualitative study examining pediatric clinicians' perceptions of delayed vaccine schedules.一项定性研究,调查儿科临床医生对延迟疫苗接种时间表的看法。
Vaccine. 2020 Jun 19;38(30):4740-4746. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 15.
5
Dismissal policies for vaccine refusal among US physicians: a literature review.美国医生中疫苗拒绝的解雇政策:文献综述。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 May 3;16(5):1189-1193. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1724742. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Is physician dismissal of vaccine refusers an acceptable practice in Canada? A 2018 overview.在加拿大,医生拒绝为拒绝接种疫苗者提供服务是一种可接受的做法吗?2018年概述。
Paediatr Child Health. 2019 May;24(2):92-97. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxy116. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
7
Characteristics of Physicians Who Dismiss Families for Refusing Vaccines.因患者家属拒绝接种疫苗而将其拒之门外的医生的特征。
Pediatrics. 2015 Dec;136(6):1103-11. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2086. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
8
Comparative Safety of Vaccine Adjuvants: A Summary of Current Evidence and Future Needs.疫苗佐剂的比较安全性:当前证据与未来需求综述
Drug Saf. 2015 Nov;38(11):1059-74. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0350-4.
9
Nonmedical exemptions from school immunization requirements: a systematic review.学校免疫要求的非医学豁免:一项系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):e62-84. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302190. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
10
Ready or not? School preparedness for California's new personal beliefs exemption law.准备好了吗?学校为加州新的个人信仰豁免法做准备。
Vaccine. 2014 May 7;32(22):2563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.03.051. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency of alternative immunization schedule use in a metropolitan area.都市地区替代免疫接种时间表使用的频率。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):32-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3154. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
2
Exposure of California kindergartners to students with personal belief exemptions from mandated school entry vaccinations.加利福尼亚幼儿园儿童接触因个人信仰而豁免强制性学校入学疫苗接种的学生的情况。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Aug;102(8):e59-67. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300821. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
3
Is it ethical for a medical practice to dismiss a family based on their decision not to have their child immunized?医疗机构基于某个家庭不让其孩子接种疫苗的决定而将该家庭拒之门外,这合乎道德规范吗?
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2011 Oct-Dec;13(4):122-4. doi: 10.1097/NHL.0b013e31823a61e5.
4
A game dynamic model for vaccine skeptics and vaccine believers: measles as an example.疫苗怀疑论者和疫苗信仰者的博弈动态模型:以麻疹为例。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Feb 21;295:194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
5
Pediatricians' experience with and response to parental vaccine safety concerns and vaccine refusals: a survey of Connecticut pediatricians.儿科医生在应对父母对疫苗安全性的担忧和疫苗拒绝方面的经验:康涅狄格州儿科医生的调查。
Public Health Rep. 2011 Jul-Aug;126 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):13-23. doi: 10.1177/00333549111260S203.
6
How to communicate with vaccine-hesitant parents.如何与对接种疫苗有顾虑的家长沟通。
Pediatrics. 2011 May;127 Suppl 1:S127-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1722S. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
7
Prevalence of parental concerns about childhood vaccines: the experience of primary care physicians.家长对儿童疫苗的担忧普遍存在:基层保健医生的经验。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5):548-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.025.
8
An agent-based model of income inequalities in diet in the context of residential segregation.基于主体的饮食收入不平等模型在居住隔离背景下。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):303-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.033.
9
The association between intentional delay of vaccine administration and timely childhood vaccination coverage.疫苗接种延误与儿童及时接种疫苗覆盖率之间的关联。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;125(4):534-41. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500408.
10
Measles outbreak in a highly vaccinated population, San Diego, 2008: role of the intentionally undervaccinated.2008 年圣地亚哥高度免疫人群中的麻疹爆发:故意免疫不足的作用。
Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):747-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1653. Epub 2010 Mar 22.

提供者解雇政策和疫苗犹豫家庭的聚类:基于代理的建模方法。

Provider dismissal policies and clustering of vaccine-hesitant families: an agent-based modeling approach.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Health; University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing; Philadelphia, PA USA; The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA USA.

出版信息

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Aug;9(8):1819-24. doi: 10.4161/hv.25635. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

DOI:10.4161/hv.25635
PMID:23831786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3906288/
Abstract

Many pediatric practices have adopted vaccine policies that require parents who refuse to vaccinate according to the ACIP schedule to find another health care provider. Such policies may inadvertently cluster unvaccinated patients into practices that tolerate non vaccination or alternative schedules, turning them into risky pockets of low herd immunity. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of provider zero-tolerance vaccination policies on the clustering of intentionally unvaccinated children. We developed an agent-based model of parental vaccine hesitancy, provider non-vaccination tolerance, and selection of patients into pediatric practices. We ran 84 experiments across a range of parental hesitancy and provider tolerance scenarios. When the model is initialized, all providers accommodate refusals and intentionally unvaccinated children are evenly distributed across providers. As provider tolerance decreases, hesitant children become more clustered in a smaller number of practices and eventually are not able to find a practice that will accept them. Each of these effects becomes more pronounced as the level of hesitancy in the population rises. Heterogeneity in practice tolerance to vaccine-hesitant parents has the unintended result of concentrating susceptible individuals within a small number of tolerant practices, while providing little if any compensatory protection to adherent individuals. These externalities suggest an agenda for stricter policy regulation of individual practice decisions.

摘要

许多儿科诊所都采取了疫苗政策,要求那些按照 ACIP 时间表拒绝接种疫苗的家长寻找其他医疗服务提供者。这样的政策可能会无意中将未接种疫苗的患者集中到容忍未接种疫苗或替代时间表的诊所中,使他们成为低群体免疫力的高风险群体。本研究的目的是评估提供者零容忍疫苗接种政策对故意未接种疫苗儿童聚集的影响。我们开发了一个基于代理的父母疫苗犹豫、提供者非疫苗接种容忍和将患者选择到儿科诊所的模型。我们在一系列父母犹豫和提供者容忍场景中进行了 84 次实验。当模型初始化时,所有提供者都接受拒绝,故意未接种疫苗的儿童在提供者之间均匀分布。随着提供者容忍度的降低,犹豫不决的儿童在少数几个实践中更加集中,最终无法找到一个接受他们的实践。随着人群中犹豫不决程度的增加,这些影响中的每一个都会变得更加明显。实践中对疫苗犹豫的父母的容忍度的异质性产生了意想不到的结果,将易感染的个体集中在少数几个容忍度高的实践中,而对坚持者几乎没有任何补偿性保护。这些外部性表明,需要更严格的政策来规范个别实践决策。