Department of Family and Community Health; University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing; Philadelphia, PA USA; The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA USA.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Aug;9(8):1819-24. doi: 10.4161/hv.25635. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
Many pediatric practices have adopted vaccine policies that require parents who refuse to vaccinate according to the ACIP schedule to find another health care provider. Such policies may inadvertently cluster unvaccinated patients into practices that tolerate non vaccination or alternative schedules, turning them into risky pockets of low herd immunity. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of provider zero-tolerance vaccination policies on the clustering of intentionally unvaccinated children. We developed an agent-based model of parental vaccine hesitancy, provider non-vaccination tolerance, and selection of patients into pediatric practices. We ran 84 experiments across a range of parental hesitancy and provider tolerance scenarios. When the model is initialized, all providers accommodate refusals and intentionally unvaccinated children are evenly distributed across providers. As provider tolerance decreases, hesitant children become more clustered in a smaller number of practices and eventually are not able to find a practice that will accept them. Each of these effects becomes more pronounced as the level of hesitancy in the population rises. Heterogeneity in practice tolerance to vaccine-hesitant parents has the unintended result of concentrating susceptible individuals within a small number of tolerant practices, while providing little if any compensatory protection to adherent individuals. These externalities suggest an agenda for stricter policy regulation of individual practice decisions.
许多儿科诊所都采取了疫苗政策,要求那些按照 ACIP 时间表拒绝接种疫苗的家长寻找其他医疗服务提供者。这样的政策可能会无意中将未接种疫苗的患者集中到容忍未接种疫苗或替代时间表的诊所中,使他们成为低群体免疫力的高风险群体。本研究的目的是评估提供者零容忍疫苗接种政策对故意未接种疫苗儿童聚集的影响。我们开发了一个基于代理的父母疫苗犹豫、提供者非疫苗接种容忍和将患者选择到儿科诊所的模型。我们在一系列父母犹豫和提供者容忍场景中进行了 84 次实验。当模型初始化时,所有提供者都接受拒绝,故意未接种疫苗的儿童在提供者之间均匀分布。随着提供者容忍度的降低,犹豫不决的儿童在少数几个实践中更加集中,最终无法找到一个接受他们的实践。随着人群中犹豫不决程度的增加,这些影响中的每一个都会变得更加明显。实践中对疫苗犹豫的父母的容忍度的异质性产生了意想不到的结果,将易感染的个体集中在少数几个容忍度高的实践中,而对坚持者几乎没有任何补偿性保护。这些外部性表明,需要更严格的政策来规范个别实践决策。