• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对可再生能源发展信息的参与:以单个半城市风力涡轮机为例。

Public engagement with information on renewable energy developments: The case of single, semi-urban wind turbines.

机构信息

Northumbria University, UK.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2013 Jan;22(1):49-64. doi: 10.1177/0963662511400962. Epub 2011 May 10.

DOI:10.1177/0963662511400962
PMID:23832884
Abstract

This paper explores perceptions of public engagement with information on renewable energy developments. It draws on a case study of proposals by a major supermarket chain to construct single wind turbines in two semi-urban locations in the UK, analysing data from interviews with key actors in the planning process and focus groups with local residents. The paper concludes that key actors often had high expectations of how local people should engage with information, and sometimes implied that members of the public who were incapable of filtering or processing information in an organised or targeted fashion had no productive role to play in the planning process. It shows how the specific nature of the proposals (single wind turbines in semi-urban locations proposed by a commercial private sector developer) shaped local residents' information needs and concerns in a way that challenged key actors' expectations of how the public should engage with information.

摘要

本文探讨了公众对可再生能源发展信息的参与认知。它借鉴了一个案例研究,该研究针对一家大型连锁超市在英国两个半城市地区建设单个风力涡轮机的提议,分析了规划过程中关键角色的访谈数据和当地居民的焦点小组数据。本文得出的结论是,关键角色通常对当地人应该如何参与信息有很高的期望,有时甚至暗示那些无法以有组织或有针对性的方式筛选或处理信息的公众在规划过程中没有发挥作用。它展示了提议的具体性质(由商业私营部门开发商在半城市地区提议的单个风力涡轮机)如何以挑战关键角色对公众应该如何参与信息的期望的方式塑造了当地居民的信息需求和关注点。

相似文献

1
Public engagement with information on renewable energy developments: The case of single, semi-urban wind turbines.公众对可再生能源发展信息的参与:以单个半城市风力涡轮机为例。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Jan;22(1):49-64. doi: 10.1177/0963662511400962. Epub 2011 May 10.
2
Different shades of green: a case study of support for wind farms in the rural midwest.不同色调的绿色:美国中西部农村地区支持风力发电场的案例研究。
Environ Manage. 2013 May;51(5):1012-24. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0026-8. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
3
Foundations for offshore wind turbines.海上风力涡轮机基础。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2003 Dec 15;361(1813):2909-30. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2003.1286.
4
Drivers of Public Attitudes towards Small Wind Turbines in the UK.英国公众对小型风力涡轮机态度的驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152033. eCollection 2016.
5
Emerging trends in vibration control of wind turbines: a focus on a dual control strategy.风力涡轮机振动控制的新兴趋势:侧重于双重控制策略。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015 Feb 28;373(2035). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0069.
6
The Link between Health Complaints and Wind Turbines: Support for the Nocebo Expectations Hypothesis.健康投诉与风力涡轮机之间的联系:对反安慰剂期望假说的支持。
Front Public Health. 2014 Nov 11;2:220. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00220. eCollection 2014.
7
Fomenting Sickness: Nocebo Priming of Residents about Expected Wind Turbine Health Harms.诱发疾病:对居民进行预期风力涡轮机健康危害的反安慰剂效应启动。
Front Public Health. 2014 Dec 12;2:279. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00279. eCollection 2014.
8
Wind, power, and the situatedness of community engagement.
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):38-52. doi: 10.1177/0963662518772508. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
9
Public perception of drinking water from private water supplies: focus group analyses.公众对来自私人供水系统的饮用水的认知:焦点小组分析
BMC Public Health. 2005 Dec 9;5:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-129.
10
Health impact of wind farms.风力发电场对健康的影响。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(3):595-604.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring channels and gaps in information dissemination and acquisition among energy scientists and the public: The southeast Asian context.探索能源科学家和公众之间信息传播和获取的渠道和差距:以东南亚为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273626. eCollection 2022.