Varasteh-Ravan H R, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh Sadeq, Shokraneh Shohre, Mozayan Mohammad R, Karimi-Bondarabadi Ali Akbar
Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Yazd Cardiovascular Researches Center, Afshar Hospital, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Apr;4(2):125-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.111792.
Mean platelet volume (MPV) and platelet distribution width (PDW), markers of platelet reactivity, and white blood cell count (WBC-C), a marker of inflammation, have been shown to be predictive of unfavorable outcomes among survivors of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). we aimed to evaluate the value of admission of MPV, PDW and WBC-C for the prediction of ST segment resolution, in patient with acute STEMI treated with Streptokinase.
This cross sectional study conducted on 280 patients with STEMI treated with streptokinase, from August 2009 until August 2011, in Afshar cardiovascular center, Yazd, Iran. Blood samples were obtained on admission in 280 patients with STEMI. According to sum of ST segment resolution and Schroder's method, patients divided two groups ((patients with ST resolution≥ 70% versus group with ST resolution < 70%)). The best cut off value of MPV, PDW and WBC-C for prediction of ST resolution (STR) were identified by using the receiver operating characteristic curve. The optimum cut off level was determined by selecting points of test value that provided the greatest sum of sensitivity and specificity.
Of 280 patients enrolled this study, 39.3% of the patients with STR≥70% and in 60.7% with STR<70% were found. Patients in the STR < 70% group had higher admission MPV (10.6 ± 0.8 vs. .9.5 ± 0.8, P = 0.00) and higher PDW (13.8 ± 1.8 vs. 11.8 ± 1.7, P = 0.00)and higher WBC-C (12.1 ± 3.1 vs. 10.5 ± 2.5, P = 0.00) compare with patients with ST resolution ≥ 70%. The best cut off value of MPV for predicting STR < 70%was 10/05 fl (sensitivity 71/8 and specificity 80.9%) and for PDW was 12.85 fl (sensitivity 71.2% and specificity 83.6%) and for WBC-C was 12.65 × 1000 (sensitivity 42.9% and specificity 82.7%). The greatest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and greatest predicting value for ST resolution lower 70% was due to PDW (area = 0.812, P = 0/00).
MPV, PDW and WBC-C at admission might be valuable in the prediction of impaired STR and in planning the need for adjunctive therapy to improve outcomes with STEMI treated with Streptokinase. We can speculate that acute STEMI patients having MPV-PDW and WBC-C values above their's cut off patients should be considered for stronger antiplatelet and helps anti inflammation treatment to be able to attain a favorable ST resolution and better clinical outcome.
平均血小板体积(MPV)和血小板分布宽度(PDW)是血小板反应性的指标,白细胞计数(WBC-C)是炎症指标,已被证明可预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)幸存者的不良预后。我们旨在评估入院时MPV、PDW和WBC-C对接受链激酶治疗的急性STEMI患者ST段分辨率预测的价值。
本横断面研究于2009年8月至2011年8月在伊朗亚兹德的阿夫沙尔心血管中心对280例接受链激酶治疗的STEMI患者进行。在280例STEMI患者入院时采集血样。根据ST段分辨率总和及施罗德方法,将患者分为两组(ST段分辨率≥70%的患者与ST段分辨率<70%的患者)。通过使用受试者工作特征曲线确定MPV、PDW和WBC-C预测ST段分辨率(STR)的最佳截断值。通过选择提供最大敏感性和特异性总和的测试值点来确定最佳截断水平。
在本研究纳入的280例患者中,发现STR≥70%的患者占39.3%,STR<70%的患者占60.7%。与ST段分辨率≥70%的患者相比,STR<70%组的患者入院时MPV更高(10.6±0.8对9.5±0.8,P = 0.00)、PDW更高(13.8±1.8对11.8±1.7,P = 0.00)以及WBC-C更高(12.1±3.1对10.5±2.5,P = 0.00)。预测STR<70%时MPV的最佳截断值为10.05 fl(敏感性71.8%,特异性80.9%),PDW的最佳截断值为12.85 fl(敏感性71.2%,特异性83.6%),WBC-C的最佳截断值为12.65×1000(敏感性42.9%,特异性82.7%)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积最大且对ST段分辨率低于70%的预测价值最大的是PDW(面积 = 0.812,P = 0.00)。
入院时的MPV、PDW和WBC-C可能对预测STR受损以及规划辅助治疗以改善链激酶治疗的STEMI患者的预后有价值。我们可以推测,MPV、PDW和WBC-C值高于其截断值的急性STEMI患者应考虑接受更强的抗血小板治疗并辅助抗炎治疗以获得良好的ST段分辨率和更好的临床结局。