Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼或七氟醚用于行磁共振成像检查的儿童?一项随机研究。

Propofol-remifentanil or sevoflurane for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging? A randomised study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Sep;57(8):988-95. doi: 10.1111/aas.12151. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of children is generally performed under sedation or with general anaesthesia (GA), but the ideal regimen has not been found. The aim of this study was to see if propofol-remifentanil would be a suitable alternative for the maintenance of anaesthesia in this category of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children aged 1-10 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-2 were included. After induction with thiopental or sevoflurane, the children were randomised to maintenance of anaesthesia with an infusion of propofol and remifentanil (group PR) (56 μg/kg/min of propofol and 0.06 μg/kg/min of remifentanil) or with sevoflurane 1.3 MAC (group S). A binasal catheter was placed in group PR and a laryngeal mask airway in group S. The children breathed spontaneously. The Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score (primary end point), the number of movements during MRI, and the length of stay in the recovery room (secondary endpoints) were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty children were included in each group. A lower level of emergence delirium (measured as a lower PAED score) was found in group PR compared with group S, and the children in group PR were discharged earlier from the recovery room than the children in group S. However, 15 children in group PR vs. 0 in group S moved during the scan (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The PR infusion ensured a satisfactory stay in the recovery room, but additional boluses were necessary during the MRI. Sevoflurane was reliable during the MRI, but emergence delirium was a concern.

摘要

背景

儿童磁共振成像(MRI)通常在镇静或全身麻醉(GA)下进行,但尚未找到理想的方案。本研究旨在观察异丙酚-瑞芬太尼是否可作为该类患者麻醉维持的替代方案。

患者和方法

纳入年龄 1-10 岁、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 1-2 级的患儿。诱导后给予硫喷妥钠或七氟醚,患儿随机分为异丙酚和瑞芬太尼输注维持麻醉组(PR 组)(56μg/kg/min 异丙酚和 0.06μg/kg/min 瑞芬太尼)或 1.3 MAC 七氟醚组(S 组)。PR 组放置双鼻导管,S 组放置喉罩。患儿自主呼吸。记录儿科麻醉苏醒期躁动(PAED)评分(主要终点)、MRI 期间的运动次数和恢复室停留时间(次要终点)。

结果

每组纳入 60 例患儿。与 S 组相比,PR 组苏醒期躁动程度较低(PAED 评分较低),且从恢复室出院时间更早。但 PR 组 15 例患儿在扫描期间移动,而 S 组无患儿移动(P<0.001)。

结论

PR 输注可确保在恢复室有满意的停留时间,但在 MRI 期间需要额外的推注。七氟醚在 MRI 期间可靠,但苏醒期躁动是一个问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验