Wilkerson J Michael, Iantaffi Alex, Smolenski Derek J, Horvath Keith J, Rosser B R Simon
Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
AIDS Educ Prev. 2013 Aug;25(4):315-26. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2013.25.4.315.
To inform HIV/STI prevention messaging, the authors used cross-sectional data from 1,231 men who have sex with men (MSM) to examine the acceptability of strategies for delivering prevention messages in sexually explicit media (SEM). The majority of participants (83%) found it acceptable to include prevention messages in SEM. A latent profile analysis identified three classifications of men with similar views on the acceptability of strategies. Compared to men endorsing some strategies (54%), men endorsing all strategies (29%) were younger (PORadj = 0.56 [0.39, 0.79]) and preferred viewing SEM in which the actors used condoms for anal sex (PORadj = 1.53 [1.05, 2.23]). Men endorsing no strategies (17%) were of similar age to men endorsing some, but were more likely to prefer viewing SEM in which the actors did not use condoms (PORadj = 2.44 [1.43, 4.16]) and to report engaging in insertive unprotected anal sex within the past 3 months (PORadj = 2.03 [1.11, 3.70]). Opportunities exist to use SEM for HIV/STI prevention.
为了为艾滋病毒/性传播感染预防宣传提供信息,作者使用了来自1231名男男性行为者(MSM)的横断面数据,以检验在露骨的性媒介(SEM)中传递预防信息策略的可接受性。大多数参与者(83%)认为在露骨的性媒介中包含预防信息是可以接受的。一项潜在类别分析确定了对策略可接受性有相似看法的三类男性。与支持某些策略的男性(54%)相比,支持所有策略的男性(29%)更年轻(校正后比值比=0.56[0.39,0.79]),并且更喜欢观看男演员在肛交时使用避孕套的露骨的性媒介(校正后比值比=1.53[1.05,2.23])。不支持任何策略的男性(17%)与支持某些策略的男性年龄相仿,但更有可能更喜欢观看男演员不使用避孕套的露骨的性媒介(校正后比值比=2.44[1.43,4.16]),并且更有可能报告在过去3个月内进行过插入式无保护肛交(校正后比值比=2.03[1.11,3.70])。利用露骨的性媒介进行艾滋病毒/性传播感染预防的机会是存在的。