Wessex Cardiothoracic Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):1412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.05.031. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
Aspirin achieves its antithrombotic effect through inactivation of cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-1, thereby preventing generation of thromboxane (TX)A2 from arachidonic acid (AA). The reported prevalence of aspirin "resistance" varies significantly and is usually based on platelet function tests (PFTs) that use AA-induced platelet reactivity as a surrogate measure of the effect of aspirin, rather than specific assessment of its effect on its therapeutic target (ie, COX-1 inhibition). The reported rates are not only assay specific but also condition specific, with particularly high rates (up to 70%) previously reported in the stroke population. We investigated whether pharmacological responses to aspirin can be reliably determined from a functional test of AA-induced whole-blood clotting.
A prospective study included 35 patients admitted with ischemic stroke and commenced on 300 mg aspirin. AA-induced whole-blood clotting was measured using short thrombelastography, a previously extensively validated near-patient PFT. Serum TXB2 and inflammatory biomarkers were also measured. The prevalence of apparent aspirin resistance measured using AA was high (range from 49% to 67%). However, serum [TXB2] was consistently low, thereby confirming adequate inhibition of COX-1 by aspirin. Mean inflammatory biomarker levels were elevated throughout.
This study demonstrates that although COX-1 activity is adequately and consistently suppressed by aspirin in stroke patients, this effect is not reliably indicated by whole-blood clotting in response to AA. These data help to explain why the reported prevalence of aspirin resistance in stroke from studies employing AA-induced platelet reactivity is high and cast doubt on the veracity of such reports.
阿司匹林通过失活环氧化酶(COX)-1 来实现抗血栓作用,从而防止花生四烯酸(AA)生成血栓素(TX)A2。据报道,阿司匹林“抵抗”的发生率差异很大,通常基于血小板功能测试(PFT),该测试使用 AA 诱导的血小板反应性作为阿司匹林作用的替代测量指标,而不是对其治疗靶点(即 COX-1 抑制)的特定评估。报告的比率不仅与检测方法有关,而且与条件有关,以前在中风患者中报告的比率特别高(高达 70%)。我们研究了是否可以从 AA 诱导的全血凝固的功能测试中可靠地确定阿司匹林的药理反应。
一项前瞻性研究纳入了 35 名因缺血性中风入院并开始服用 300mg 阿司匹林的患者。使用短血栓弹性描记术测量 AA 诱导的全血凝固,这是一种以前经过广泛验证的床边 PFT。还测量了血清 TXB2 和炎症生物标志物。使用 AA 测量的阿司匹林明显抵抗的发生率很高(范围为 49%至 67%)。然而,血清[TXB2]始终较低,从而证实阿司匹林对 COX-1 的抑制作用充分。整个过程中,平均炎症生物标志物水平升高。
本研究表明,尽管 COX-1 活性在中风患者中被阿司匹林充分且一致地抑制,但这一作用不能通过 AA 诱导的全血凝固反应可靠地表明。这些数据有助于解释为什么在使用 AA 诱导的血小板反应性的研究中报告的中风患者中阿司匹林抵抗的发生率很高,并对这些报告的真实性提出质疑。