• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持非专业人士判断风险评估的可信度(CORA)。

Supporting non-experts in judging the credibility of risk assessments (CORA).

机构信息

Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Science Forum EMF, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:624-30. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.034. Epub 2013 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.034
PMID:23838055
Abstract

One of the crucial communication issues that have to be tackled by risk assessors is how to provide a comprehensible and informative characterization of their findings. The CORA framework (CORA stands for credibility of risk assessment) is designed for helping non-experts in judging the credibility of risk assessments. The CORA framework can be used by (1) stakeholders and policy makers, to make an educated judgment about the credibility of an assessment, and (2) the authors of a risk assessment, to improve the evaluability of their reports. The CORA framework consists of 18 criteria, leading to six main recommendations. The framework's application is not limited to (EMF) risk assessment, for which it was originally developed, but can be used in any area of risk or hazard assessment.

摘要

风险评估人员必须解决的关键沟通问题之一是如何对他们的发现进行通俗易懂且信息丰富的描述。CORA 框架(CORA 代表风险评估的可信度)旨在帮助非专业人士判断风险评估的可信度。CORA 框架可用于:(1) 利益相关者和政策制定者,对评估的可信度做出明智的判断,以及 (2) 风险评估的作者,提高其报告的可评估性。CORA 框架由 18 项标准组成,得出了 6 项主要建议。该框架的应用不仅限于(电磁场)风险评估,因为它最初是为该评估而开发的,而且可以用于任何风险或危害评估领域。

相似文献

1
Supporting non-experts in judging the credibility of risk assessments (CORA).支持非专业人士判断风险评估的可信度(CORA)。
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:624-30. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.034. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
2
Framework for metals risk assessment.金属风险评估框架。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2007 Oct;68(2):145-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.03.015.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses.证据权重分析最佳实践框架研究综述。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Oct;43(9):753-84. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2013.832727.
5
Beyond risk assessment: principles for assessing community impacts.超越风险评估:评估社区影响的原则。
Int J Toxicol. 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):78-87. doi: 10.1177/1091581809352690. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
6
Refinement of the ECETOC approach to identify endocrine disrupting properties of chemicals in ecotoxicology.细化 ECETOC 方法以鉴定生态毒理学中化学品的内分泌干扰特性。
Toxicol Lett. 2013 Dec 16;223(3):291-4. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
7
The challenge of making ozone risk assessment for forest trees more mechanistic.使森林树木臭氧风险评估更具机械性的挑战。
Environ Pollut. 2008 Dec;156(3):567-82. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
8
An overview of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants.电离污染物环境风险评估与管理的ERICA综合方法概述。
J Environ Radioact. 2008 Sep;99(9):1364-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.11.019. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
9
Enhancing the credibility of decisions based on scientific conclusions: transparency is imperative.提高基于科学结论的决策的可信度:透明度是必要的。
Toxicol Sci. 2010 Jul;116(1):5-7. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq102. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
10
Brief communication: the ecosystem perspective in ecotoxicology as a way forward for the ecological risk assessment of chemicals.简讯:生态毒理学中的生态系统观——推进化学品生态风险评估的一种途径。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013 Jul;9(3):e34-8. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1428. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder consultations and opportunities for integrating socio-behavioural factors into the pesticide risk analysis process.利益相关者磋商以及将社会行为因素纳入到农药风险分析过程中的机会。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Feb;23(3):2937-47. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5553-9.