结直肠癌的肿瘤位置和微卫星不稳定性的生存情况:结肠癌家族登记处。

Colon and rectal cancer survival by tumor location and microsatellite instability: the Colon Cancer Family Registry.

机构信息

Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Aug;56(8):937-44. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828f9a57.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancers in the proximal colon, distal colon, and rectum are frequently studied together; however, there are biological differences in cancers across these sites, particularly in the prevalence of microsatellite instability.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the differences in survival by colon or rectal cancer site, considering the contribution of microsatellite instability to such differences.

DESIGN

This is a population-based prospective cohort study for cancer survival.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted within the Colon Cancer Family Registry, an international consortium. Participants were identified from population-based cancer registries in the United States, Canada, and Australia.

PATIENTS

Information on tumor site, microsatellite instability, and survival after diagnosis was available for 3284 men and women diagnosed with incident invasive colon or rectal cancer between 1997 and 2002, with ages at diagnosis ranging from 18 to 74.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios for the association between all-cause mortality and tumor location, overall and by microsatellite instability status.

RESULTS

Distal colon (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49-0.71) and rectal cancers (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57-0.81) were associated with lower mortality than proximal colon cancer overall. Compared specifically with patients with proximal colon cancer exhibiting no/low microsatellite instability, patients with distal colon and rectal cancers experienced lower mortality, regardless of microsatellite instability status; patients with proximal colon cancer exhibiting high microsatellite instability had the lowest mortality.

LIMITATIONS

Study limitations include the absence of stage at diagnosis and cause-of-death information for all but a subset of study participants. Some patient groups defined jointly by tumor site and microsatellite instability status are subject to small numbers.

CONCLUSION

Proximal colon cancer survival differs from survival for distal colon and rectal cancer in a manner apparently dependent on microsatellite instability status. These findings support the premise that proximal colon, distal colon, and rectal cancers are clinicopathologically distinct.

摘要

背景

近端结肠癌、远端结肠癌和直肠癌经常一起进行研究;然而,这些部位的癌症存在生物学差异,特别是微卫星不稳定性的发生率存在差异。

目的

通过结肠癌或直肠癌部位评估生存差异,并考虑微卫星不稳定性对这些差异的贡献。

设计

这是一项基于人群的癌症生存前瞻性队列研究。

设置

本研究在国际合作的结肠癌家族登记处进行。参与者是从美国、加拿大和澳大利亚的人群癌症登记处确定的。

患者

1997 年至 2002 年间诊断出患有侵袭性结肠癌或直肠癌的 3284 名男性和女性的肿瘤部位、微卫星不稳定性和诊断后生存信息可用,诊断时年龄为 18 至 74 岁。

主要观察指标

使用 Cox 回归计算全因死亡率与肿瘤部位之间的关联的风险比,总体和按微卫星不稳定性状态进行分层。

结果

与近端结肠癌相比,远端结肠癌(HR,0.59;95%CI,0.49-0.71)和直肠癌(HR,0.68;95%CI,0.57-0.81)的死亡率整体较低。具体而言,与近端结肠癌患者中无/低微卫星不稳定性的患者相比,无论微卫星不稳定性状态如何,远端结肠癌和直肠癌患者的死亡率均较低;近端结肠癌中高微卫星不稳定性患者的死亡率最低。

局限性

研究的局限性包括并非所有研究参与者都具有诊断时的分期和死因信息。一些联合肿瘤部位和微卫星不稳定性状态定义的患者群体数量较少。

结论

近端结肠癌的生存与远端结肠癌和直肠癌的生存不同,这种差异显然取决于微卫星不稳定性状态。这些发现支持近端结肠、远端结肠和直肠癌在临床病理上具有明显不同的前提。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索