Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Modena Policlinic, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy,
J Orthop Traumatol. 2013 Dec;14(4):291-7. doi: 10.1007/s10195-013-0252-0. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
The treatment of radial neck fractures in children varies according to the displacement, angulation, and skeletal maturity. There is a general agreement that displaced radial neck fractures with more than 30° angulations (Judet type III and IV fractures) should be surgically treated. There are several treatment possibilities for Judet type III and IV fractures including percutaneous pin reduction, elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN), and open reduction with or without internal fixation. In this retrospective study we compared the clinical and radiographical outcomes, and complications following intramedullary versus percutaneous pinning in displaced radial neck fractures in children.
Between 2000 and 2011, 20 patients were treated using closed reduction: in 12 cases we used percutaneous pinning, and in 8 cases we used ESIN. According to Judet classification the two groups were composed as follows: 10 (77 %) type III and 3 (23 %) type IV fractures in the percutaneous pinning group; 4 (57 %) type III, and 3 (43 %) type IV fractures in the ESIN group.
After an average of 42 months, excellent results in Mayo elbow performance scores (MEPS) were obtained in 71 and 69 % of ESIN and percutaneous pinning groups respectively, with good results in the remaining cases apart from one fair case (8 %) in the percutaneous pinning group. After a radiological evaluation, all fractures healed in excellent or good alignment. When comparing the two groups, the subjects treated with the ESIN technique had higher range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension and pronation. No patients developed complications, except three cases of asymptomatic enlargements of the radial head, reported only in the percutaneous pinning group.
In this research the clinical outcome, assessed with the MEPS, and the radiological alignment, were comparable between the subjects that were treated with percutaneous pinning and those with ESIN techniques; whereas the ESIN technique demonstrated higher ROM in flexion, extension and pronation. The ESIN technique seems to be the ideal approach both for the higher ROM values and for the absence of complications.
儿童桡骨颈骨折的治疗方法因移位、成角和骨骼成熟度而异。一般认为,成角超过 30°(Judet III 型和 IV 型骨折)的移位桡骨颈骨折应采用手术治疗。对于 Judet III 型和 IV 型骨折,有几种治疗方法,包括经皮钢针复位、弹性稳定髓内钉(ESIN)和切开复位内固定或不固定。在这项回顾性研究中,我们比较了儿童移位桡骨颈骨折经皮钢针与髓内针固定的临床和影像学结果及并发症。
2000 年至 2011 年,20 例患者采用闭合复位治疗:12 例采用经皮钢针固定,8 例采用 ESIN。根据 Judet 分类,两组患者分别为:经皮钢针组 10 例(77%)为 III 型,3 例(23%)为 IV 型;ESIN 组 4 例(57%)为 III 型,3 例(43%)为 IV 型。
平均随访 42 个月后,ESIN 组和经皮钢针组 Mayo 肘关节功能评分(MEPS)分别获得 71%和 69%的优秀结果,其余病例均为良好,经皮钢针组仅有 1 例(8%)为一般。放射学评估后,所有骨折均愈合良好。比较两组患者,ESIN 组的屈伸和旋前活动度更大。除经皮钢针组 3 例报告无症状桡骨头增大外,无其他并发症。
在这项研究中,经皮钢针组和 ESIN 组的 MEPS 临床结果和放射学对线结果相当;而 ESIN 组在屈伸和旋前活动度更大。ESIN 技术似乎是一种理想的方法,既能获得更高的活动度,又能避免并发症。