Jiang Kun, Feng Wenyu, Geng Lei, Zheng Bufeng
Binzhou Medical University Hospital, Binzhou, China.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Sep 16;145(1):449. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06066-6.
The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes of flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) and Kirschner wire (KW) fixation in the surgical treatment of paediatric radial neck fractures to provide evidence-based guidance for optimising therapeutic strategies.
In this retrospective comparative study, the cases of 68 paediatric patients with Judet III-IV radial neck fractures between February 2018 and March 2023 were analysed; 37 patients underwent FIN, and 31 KW. Comparative parameters included operative time, time to implant removal, complications, and functional recovery, which were evaluated using forearm rotation loss, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and the Métaizeau radiographic classification.
All patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. No significant difference in operative time was observed between the two groups. The time to implant removal was significantly longer in the FIN group (262.05 ± 49.16 days) than in the KW group (32.06 ± 3.63 days; P < 0.05). Functional outcomes, as assessed by the MEPS, were significantly better in the FIN group, with 97.3% of patients achieving excellent or good results, compared to 83.9% in the KW group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the FIN group exhibited significantly less forearm rotation loss (6.03 ± 8.44° vs. 17.06 ± 19.04°, P < 0.05). Although complication rates were generally low, the KW group had a slightly higher incidence, primarily due to pin tract infections.
FIN fixation offers superior functional outcomes, less forearm rotation loss, and a lower risk of superficial infection compared to KW fixation for paediatric radial neck fractures. While KW allows for earlier implant removal, it is associated with a greater risk of infection. Therefore, FIN is recommended as the preferred surgical option in clinical practice.
本研究旨在比较弹性髓内钉(FIN)与克氏针(KW)固定术治疗小儿桡骨颈骨折的临床疗效,为优化治疗策略提供循证指导。
在这项回顾性比较研究中,分析了2018年2月至2023年3月期间68例Judet III-IV型小儿桡骨颈骨折患者的病例;37例患者接受了FIN治疗,31例接受了KW治疗。比较参数包括手术时间、内固定取出时间、并发症和功能恢复情况,采用前臂旋转丢失、梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)和梅塔佐X线分类进行评估。
所有患者术后至少随访24个月。两组患者的基线特征具有可比性。两组手术时间差异无统计学意义。FIN组内固定取出时间(262.05±49.16天)明显长于KW组(32.06±3.63天;P<0.05)。根据MEPS评估,FIN组的功能结局明显更好,97.3%的患者获得了优或良的结果,而KW组为83.9%(P<0.05)。此外,FIN组的前臂旋转丢失明显更少(6.03±8.44°对17.06±19.04°,P<0.05)。虽然并发症发生率总体较低,但KW组的发生率略高,主要原因是针道感染。
与KW固定术相比,FIN固定术治疗小儿桡骨颈骨折具有更好的功能结局、更少的前臂旋转丢失和更低的浅表感染风险。虽然KW允许更早取出内固定,但感染风险更高。因此,在临床实践中,推荐FIN作为首选的手术方式。