Weitz J I, Hudoba M, Massel D, Maraganore J, Hirsh J
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Invest. 1990 Aug;86(2):385-91. doi: 10.1172/JCI114723.
Propagation of venous thrombi or rethrombosis after coronary thrombolytic therapy can occur despite heparin administration. To explore potential mechanisms, we set out to determine whether clot-bound thrombin is relatively protected from inhibition by heparin-antithrombin III but susceptible to inactivation by antithrombin III-independent inhibitors. Using plasma fibrinopeptide A (FPA) levels as an index of thrombin activity, we compared the ability of thrombin inhibitors to block FPA release mediated by fluid-phase thrombin with their activity against the clot-bound enzyme. Incubation of thrombin with citrated plasma results in concentration-dependent FPA generation, which reaches a plateau within minutes. In contrast, there is progressive FPA generation when fibrin clots are incubated with citrated plasma. Heparin, hirudin, hirudin dodecapeptide (hirugen), and D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginyl chloromethyl ketone (PPACK) produce concentration-dependent inhibition of FPA release mediated by fluid-phase thrombin. However, heparin is much less effective at inhibiting thrombin bound to fibrin because a 20-fold higher concentration is necessary to block 70% of the activity of the clot-bound enzyme than is required for equivalent inhibition of fluid-phase thrombin (2.0 and 0.1 U/ml, respectively). In contrast, hirugen and PPACK are equally effective inhibitors of fluid- and solid-phase thrombin, while hirudin is only 50% as effective against the clot-bound enzyme. None of the inhibitors displace bound 125I-labeled thrombin from the clot. These studies indicate that (a) clot-bound thrombin is relatively protected from inhibition by heparin, possibly because the heparin binding site on thrombin is inaccessible when the enzyme is bound to fibrin, and (b) clot-bound thrombin is susceptible to inactivation by antithrombin III-independent inhibitors because the sites of their interaction are not masked by thrombin binding to fibrin. For these reasons, antithrombin III-independent inhibitors may be more effective than heparin in certain clinical settings.
尽管使用了肝素,冠状动脉溶栓治疗后静脉血栓仍可能传播或再次形成血栓。为了探究潜在机制,我们着手确定与凝块结合的凝血酶是否相对受到肝素 - 抗凝血酶III抑制的保护,但易受抗凝血酶III非依赖性抑制剂的灭活作用。以血浆纤维蛋白肽A(FPA)水平作为凝血酶活性指标,我们比较了凝血酶抑制剂阻断液相凝血酶介导的FPA释放的能力与其对凝块结合酶的活性。凝血酶与枸橼酸盐血浆孵育会导致浓度依赖性的FPA生成,几分钟内达到平台期。相比之下,纤维蛋白凝块与枸橼酸盐血浆孵育时,FPA会持续生成。肝素、水蛭素、水蛭素十二肽(hirugen)和D - 苯丙氨酰 - L - 脯氨酰 - L - 精氨酰氯甲基酮(PPACK)对液相凝血酶介导的FPA释放产生浓度依赖性抑制。然而,肝素在抑制与纤维蛋白结合的凝血酶方面效果要差得多,因为要阻断70%的凝块结合酶活性所需的浓度比同等抑制液相凝血酶所需浓度高20倍(分别为2.0和0.1 U/ml)。相比之下,hirugen和PPACK对液相和固相凝血酶的抑制效果相同,而水蛭素对凝块结合酶的抑制效果仅为前者的50%。没有一种抑制剂能将结合在凝块上的125I标记凝血酶置换下来。这些研究表明:(a)与凝块结合的凝血酶相对受到肝素抑制的保护,可能是因为当该酶与纤维蛋白结合时,凝血酶上的肝素结合位点无法接近;(b)与凝块结合的凝血酶易受抗凝血酶III非依赖性抑制剂的灭活作用,因为它们相互作用的位点不会被凝血酶与纤维蛋白的结合所掩盖。由于这些原因,在某些临床情况下,抗凝血酶III非依赖性抑制剂可能比肝素更有效。