• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血清胆固醇测量的变异性:对筛查和监测的影响。

The variability of serum cholesterol measurements: implications for screening and monitoring.

作者信息

Thompson S G, Pocock S J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, U.K.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(8):783-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90238-k.

DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90238-k
PMID:2384766
Abstract

The reliability of screening for high serum total cholesterol is adversely affected by the variability of cholesterol levels over time. This problem is investigated using data on repeated cholesterol measurements for 14,600 men and women in the MRC Mild Hypertension Trial. For measurements 1 year apart, the within-person coefficient of variation (CV) is 7%, which is substantial compared with the between-person CV of 15%. In a screening programme, this within-person variability may lead to the misclassification of individuals and inappropriate intervention. For example, 28% of middle-aged British men with a single cholesterol measurement above 6.9 mmol/l have a long-term average cholesterol below that value even without intervention. Using averages of several cholesterol measurements reduces, but does not eliminate, these problems. Furthermore, monitoring the effect of interventions in individuals by sequential cholesterol measurement may be unhelpful or even misleading. These problems cast serious doubt on the value of general population screening for high cholesterol levels.

摘要

血清总胆固醇水平随时间的变化会对高血清总胆固醇筛查的可靠性产生不利影响。利用医学研究委员会轻度高血压试验中14600名男性和女性的重复胆固醇测量数据对这一问题进行了调查。对于间隔1年的测量,个体内变异系数(CV)为7%,与个体间15%的变异系数相比相当大。在筛查项目中,这种个体内变异性可能导致个体的错误分类和不适当的干预。例如,单次胆固醇测量高于6.9 mmol/l的中年英国男性中,即使不进行干预,也有28%的人长期平均胆固醇水平低于该值。使用多次胆固醇测量的平均值可以减少但不能消除这些问题。此外,通过连续胆固醇测量来监测个体干预效果可能毫无帮助甚至会产生误导。这些问题严重质疑了对普通人群进行高胆固醇水平筛查的价值。

相似文献

1
The variability of serum cholesterol measurements: implications for screening and monitoring.血清胆固醇测量的变异性:对筛查和监测的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(8):783-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90238-k.
2
Time-dependent variability in repeated measurements of cholesterol levels: clinical implications for risk misclassification and intervention monitoring.胆固醇水平重复测量中的时间依赖性变异性:风险误分类和干预监测的临床意义。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;46(10):1159-71. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90115-h.
3
Lipid re-screening: what is the best measure and interval?血脂再筛查:最佳检测指标和间隔时间是什么?
Heart. 2010 Mar;96(6):448-52. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.172619. Epub 2009 Jun 14.
4
5
Variability in cholesterol measurements in a worksite cholesterol screening program.工作场所胆固醇筛查项目中胆固醇测量值的变异性。
Am J Prev Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;7(6):406-9.
6
Monitoring cholesterol levels: measurement error or true change?监测胆固醇水平:测量误差还是真实变化?
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 6;148(9):656-61. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-9-200805060-00005.
7
One measurement of serum total cholesterol is enough to predict future levels in healthy postmenopausal women.对健康的绝经后女性而言,一次血清总胆固醇测量足以预测其未来的胆固醇水平。
Am J Med. 1992 Jan;92(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90010-9.
8
[Variation in serum cholesterol level in the same person: what is the true value and when is it called a significant change?].[同一个人血清胆固醇水平的变化:真实值是什么以及何时被称为显著变化?]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1992 Aug 1;136(31):1507-11.
9
Within-person variation in serum lipids: implications for clinical trials.
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;33(3):534-41. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh057. Epub 2004 Mar 11.
10
Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.骨密度测量中的变异性来源:对研究设计和骨质流失分析的影响。
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Jan;12(1):124-35. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.124.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing self-reported and measured hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia at standard and more stringent diagnostic thresholds: the cross-sectional 2010-2015 Busselton Healthy Ageing study.在标准诊断阈值和更严格诊断阈值下比较自我报告与测量的高血压和高胆固醇血症:2010 - 2015年巴瑟尔顿健康老龄化横断面研究
Clin Hypertens. 2022 Jun 1;28(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40885-022-00199-1.
2
Underestimating the Effect of Lipids on Cardiovascular Events: Regression Dilution Bias in the Population-Based Cohort of Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.低估脂质对心血管事件的影响:德黑兰脂质与血糖研究人群队列中的回归稀释偏倚
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Oct 3;13(4):e27528. doi: 10.5812/ijem.27528. eCollection 2015 Oct.
3
Correcting for multivariate measurement error by regression calibration in meta-analyses of epidemiological studies.
在流行病学研究的荟萃分析中通过回归校准校正多变量测量误差。
Stat Med. 2009 Mar 30;28(7):1067-92. doi: 10.1002/sim.3530.
4
Cholesterol and coronary heart disease: screening and treatment.胆固醇与冠心病:筛查与治疗
Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7(4):232-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.4.232.
5
Cholesterol screening and cholesterol lowering treatment.胆固醇筛查与降胆固醇治疗。
Qual Health Care. 1993 Jun;2(2):134-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.2.134.
6
Systematic underestimation of association between serum cholesterol concentration and ischaemic heart disease in observational studies: data from the BUPA study.观察性研究中血清胆固醇浓度与缺血性心脏病之间关联的系统性低估:来自保柏(BUPA)研究的数据
BMJ. 1994 Feb 5;308(6925):363-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6925.363.
7
Identifying patients with hypercholesterolemia. More than one blood sample is needed.识别高胆固醇血症患者。需要采集不止一份血样。
Can Fam Physician. 1995 Feb;41:240-5.