• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性疖病:CMC 方案的疗效——皮肤消毒(氯己定)、局部鼻腔使用抗生素(莫匹罗星)及全身使用抗生素(克林霉素)。

Recurrent furunculosis: Efficacy of the CMC regimen--skin disinfection (chlorhexidine), local nasal antibiotic (mupirocin), and systemic antibiotic (clindamycin).

作者信息

Davido Benjamin, Dinh Aurélien, Salomon Jérôme, Roux Anne Laure, Gosset-Woimant Marine, Pierre Isabelle, Perronne Christian, Bernard Louis

机构信息

From the Infectious Diseases Department, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Paris Ile-de-France Ouest University , Garches.

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;45(11):837-41. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2013.810815. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

DOI:10.3109/00365548.2013.810815
PMID:23848409
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment of recurrent furunculosis is poorly documented and represents a public health challenge. The medical care of this disease is often disappointing, especially as the disease evolution is uncertain and relapses occur. We report the efficacy and safety of our CMC regimen: skin disinfection (chlorhexidine), local nasal antibiotic (mupirocin), and systemic antibiotic (clindamycin).

METHODS

Patients attending our institution during the period 2006-2012 for recurrent furunculosis (≥ 4 episodes/y) were enrolled in the study. Clinical and bacteriological data were collected. Staphylococcus aureus colonization was also investigated in close contacts, and carriers were treated. Patients were treated with the CMC regimen: skin disinfection with chlorhexidine for 21 days, nasal mupirocin ointment for 5 days, and oral clindamycin 1800-2400 mg for 21 days.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included. Their mean age was 36 ± 14.5 y and the male to female sex ratio was 1.1. Screening swabs from all sites were S. aureus-positive in 63% (n = 12), including 4 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Before the CMC regimen, the median time to relapse was 31 days (mean 52 days). The mean number of recurrences was 5.5 ± 2.4/y. After the CMC regimen, among 16 patients who had a complete follow-up, 14 were healed beyond 9 months. Two recurrences occurred, 1 in an MRSA carrier and 1 in a patient with an insufficiently treated dermatosis. No serious side effect occurred that required the cessation of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There are 2 major routes involved in recurrent furunculosis: risk factors and staphylococcal colonization of close contacts. Our procedure is safe and effective, with 87% remission beyond 9 months. It merits testing on larger numbers of participants.

摘要

背景

复发性疖病的治疗记录较少,是一项公共卫生挑战。该疾病的医疗护理往往令人失望,尤其是因为疾病进展不确定且会复发。我们报告了我们的CMC方案的疗效和安全性:皮肤消毒(氯己定)、局部鼻腔抗生素(莫匹罗星)和全身抗生素(克林霉素)。

方法

纳入2006年至2012年期间因复发性疖病(每年≥4次发作)到我们机构就诊的患者。收集临床和细菌学数据。还对密切接触者进行金黄色葡萄球菌定植调查,并对携带者进行治疗。患者接受CMC方案治疗:用氯己定进行皮肤消毒21天,鼻腔涂抹莫匹罗星软膏5天,口服克林霉素1800 - 2400毫克,持续21天。

结果

纳入19名患者。他们的平均年龄为36±14.5岁,男女比例为1.1。所有部位的筛查拭子中,63%(n = 12)为金黄色葡萄球菌阳性,其中包括4例耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。在CMC方案治疗前,复发的中位时间为31天(平均52天)。平均复发次数为5.5±2.4次/年。在CMC方案治疗后,在16名接受完整随访的患者中,14名在9个月后痊愈。发生了2次复发,1次发生在MRSA携带者中,1次发生在皮肤病治疗不充分的患者中。未出现需要停止治疗的严重副作用。

结论

复发性疖病涉及两条主要途径:危险因素和密切接触者的葡萄球菌定植。我们的方法安全有效,9个月后缓解率为87%。值得在更多参与者身上进行测试。

相似文献

1
Recurrent furunculosis: Efficacy of the CMC regimen--skin disinfection (chlorhexidine), local nasal antibiotic (mupirocin), and systemic antibiotic (clindamycin).复发性疖病:CMC 方案的疗效——皮肤消毒(氯己定)、局部鼻腔使用抗生素(莫匹罗星)及全身使用抗生素(克林霉素)。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;45(11):837-41. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2013.810815. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
2
Highly effective regimen for decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers.针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌携带者去定植的高效方案。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;29(6):510-6. doi: 10.1086/588201.
3
[Treatment of recurrent furunculosis].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(5):A5548.
4
Mupirocin ointment with and without chlorhexidine baths in the eradication of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in nursing home residents.莫匹罗星软膏联合或不联合洗必泰沐浴用于根除疗养院居民鼻腔携带金黄色葡萄球菌的研究
Am J Infect Control. 1995 Oct;23(5):306-9. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(95)90061-6.
5
Topical therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization: impact on infection risk.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌定植的局部治疗:对感染风险的影响
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;30(7):623-32. doi: 10.1086/597550.
6
Nasal carriage of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the prevalence, patients at risk and the effect of elimination on outcomes among outclinic haemodialysis patients.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的鼻腔携带情况:门诊血液透析患者中的患病率、高危患者以及清除该菌对预后的影响
Eur J Med Res. 2007 Jul 26;12(7):284-8.
7
Epidemiology and prevention of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in hemodialyzed patients.血液透析患者金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔携带的流行病学和预防。
Med Mal Infect. 2011 Sep;41(9):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
8
Successful termination of a furunculosis outbreak due to lukS-lukF-positive, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a German village by stringent decolonization, 2002-2005.2002年至2005年,德国一个村庄通过严格的去定植措施成功终止了由lukS-lukF阳性、甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌引起的疖病暴发。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 1;44(11):e88-95. doi: 10.1086/517503. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
9
Decolonization to Reduce Postdischarge Infection Risk among MRSA Carriers.去殖民化以降低耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌携带者的出院后感染风险。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):638-650. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716771.
10
[Hospital personnel who are nasal carriers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Usefulness of treatment with mupirocin].[耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻腔携带者的医院工作人员。莫匹罗星治疗的有效性]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1992 Feb;10(2):107-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Mupirocin for Skin Infection: Clinical Experience from China.莫匹罗星治疗皮肤感染:来自中国的临床经验。
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Sep 13;17:3955-3966. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S475611. eCollection 2024.
2
Interventions for bacterial folliculitis and boils (furuncles and carbuncles).细菌性毛囊炎及疖(疖肿和痈)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD013099. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013099.pub2.