1 Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Popul Health Manag. 2014 Feb;17(1):48-53. doi: 10.1089/pop.2013.0004. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
Collaborative care management (CCM) for depression has been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes. The impetus for this study was to determine if outpatient utilization patterns would be associated with depression outcomes. The hypothesis was that depression remission would be independently correlated with outpatient utilization at 6 and 12 months after enrollment into CCM. The study was a retrospective chart review analysis of 773 patients enrolled into CCM with 6- and 12-month follow-up data. The data set comprised baseline demographic data, patient intake self-assessment scores (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Mood Disorder Questionnaire, and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test), the number of outpatient visits, and follow-up PHQ-9 scores. To control for individual patient complexity and pattern of usage, the number of outpatient visits for 6 months prior to enrollment also was measured. With a logistic regression model for outpatient visit outlier status as the dependent variable, remission at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 0.519, CI [confidence interval] 0.349-0.770, P=0.001) and remission at 12 months (OR 0.573, CI 0.354-0.927, P=0.023) were predictive. With this inverse relationship between remission and outlier status, those patients who were not in remission had an OR of 1.928 for outpatient visit outlier status at 6 months after enrollment and an OR of 1.745 at 12 months. Patients who improved clinically to remission while in CCM had decreased odds of outlier status for outpatient utilization at 6 and 12 months when controlling for all other study variables. Improvement in health care outcomes by CCM could translate into decreased outpatient utilization for depressed patients.
协作式护理管理(CCM)在改善抑郁患者的临床结局方面已经得到了验证。本研究的目的是确定门诊利用模式是否与抑郁结局相关。假设是抑郁缓解将与 CCM 入组后 6 个月和 12 个月的门诊利用独立相关。该研究是对 773 名入组 CCM 并进行 6 个月和 12 个月随访的患者进行的回顾性图表审查分析。数据集包括基线人口统计学数据、患者入组自我评估评分(患者健康问卷[PHQ-9]、广泛性焦虑症-7、情绪障碍问卷和酒精使用障碍识别测试)、门诊就诊次数和随访 PHQ-9 评分。为了控制个体患者的复杂性和使用模式,还测量了入组前 6 个月的门诊就诊次数。采用门诊就诊异常状态的逻辑回归模型作为因变量,6 个月时缓解(优势比[OR]0.519,CI[置信区间]0.349-0.770,P=0.001)和 12 个月时缓解(OR 0.573,CI 0.354-0.927,P=0.023)是预测因素。由于缓解与异常状态之间存在这种反向关系,那些未缓解的患者在入组后 6 个月时门诊就诊异常状态的 OR 为 1.928,12 个月时的 OR 为 1.745。在控制所有其他研究变量的情况下,CCM 使患者的临床状况得到改善并达到缓解的患者,其门诊利用异常状态的可能性在 6 个月和 12 个月时降低。通过 CCM 改善医疗保健结果可能会导致抑郁患者的门诊利用减少。