• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

并发的下背部疾病对抑郁结局的影响。

Effects of concurrent low back conditions on depression outcomes.

作者信息

Angstman Kurt B, Bansal Shalu, Chappell Daniel H, Bock F Andrew, Rasmussen Norman H

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905-0002, USA.

出版信息

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Jul;113(7):530-7. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.004.

DOI:10.7556/jaoa.2013.004
PMID:23843376
Abstract

CONTEXT

Depression and low back problems are common issues in primary care.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 6-month depression outcomes (specifically, clinical results and number of outpatient visits) in patients with or without comorbid low back conditions (LBCs). The authors hypothesized that the presence of an LBC within 3 months of the diagnosis of depression would negatively affect clinical outcomes of depression treatment after 6 months.

DESIGN

Retrospective record review.

SETTING

Collaborative care management program in a large primary care practice.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a diagnosis of depression enrolled in collaborative care management (N=1326), including 172 with and 1154 without evidence of an LBC within 3 months of enrollment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical depression outcomes (remission and persistent depressive symptoms) and number of outpatient visits at 6 months.

RESULTS

Regression modeling for clinical remission and persistent depressive symptoms at 6 months demonstrated that LBCs were not an independent factor affecting clinical remission (P=.24) but were associated with persistent depressive symptoms (odds ratio, 1.559; 95% confidence interval, 1.065-2.282; P=.02); LBCs remained an independent predictor of outlier status for outpatient visits (≥8 clinical visits after 6 months of enrollment), with an odds ratio of 1.581 (95% confidence interval, 1.086-2.30; P=.02).

CONCLUSION

Increased odds of persistent depressive symptoms and increased number of outpatient visits were found in patients with depression and concomitant LBCs 6 months after enrollment into collaborative care management, compared with those in patients with depression and without LBCs. The data suggest that temporally related LBCs could lead to worse outcomes in primary care patients being treated for depression, encouraging closer observation and possible therapeutic changes in this cohort.

摘要

背景

抑郁症和腰背痛问题是初级保健中的常见问题。

目的

比较合并或未合并腰椎疾病(LBCs)的患者6个月时的抑郁结局(具体而言,临床结果和门诊就诊次数)。作者假设在抑郁症诊断后3个月内存在LBCs会对6个月后抑郁症治疗的临床结果产生负面影响。

设计

回顾性记录审查。

地点

大型初级保健机构中的协作护理管理项目。

参与者

参与协作护理管理的抑郁症诊断患者(N = 1326),其中172例在入组后3个月内有LBCs证据,1154例无LBCs证据。

主要结局指标

6个月时的临床抑郁结局(缓解和持续性抑郁症状)以及门诊就诊次数。

结果

对6个月时临床缓解和持续性抑郁症状的回归模型显示,LBCs不是影响临床缓解的独立因素(P = 0.24),但与持续性抑郁症状相关(优势比,1.559;95%置信区间,1.065 - 2.282;P = 0.02);LBCs仍然是门诊就诊异常状态(入组6个月后≥8次临床就诊)的独立预测因素,优势比为1.581(95%置信区间,1.086 - 2.30;P = 0.02)。

结论

与无LBCs的抑郁症患者相比,入组协作护理管理6个月后,合并LBCs的抑郁症患者持续性抑郁症状的几率增加,门诊就诊次数增多。数据表明,时间上相关的LBCs可能导致接受抑郁症治疗的初级保健患者出现更差的结局,这促使对该队列进行更密切的观察和可能的治疗调整。

相似文献

1
Effects of concurrent low back conditions on depression outcomes.并发的下背部疾病对抑郁结局的影响。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Jul;113(7):530-7. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.004.
2
Impact of symptom remission on outpatient visits in depressed primary care patients treated with collaborative care management and usual care.协作式护理管理联合常规护理对抑郁初级保健患者症状缓解及其门诊就诊次数的影响。
Popul Health Manag. 2014 Jun;17(3):180-4. doi: 10.1089/pop.2013.0057. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
3
Depression remission decreases outpatient utilization at 6 and 12 months after enrollment into collaborative care management.抑郁缓解可降低入组协作式护理管理后 6 个月和 12 个月的门诊利用率。
Popul Health Manag. 2014 Feb;17(1):48-53. doi: 10.1089/pop.2013.0004. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
4
Future complexity of care tier affected by depression outcomes.抑郁症结局影响未来护理层级的复杂性。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):30-5. doi: 10.1177/2150131913511465. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
5
Personality Disorders in Primary Care: Impact on Depression Outcomes Within Collaborative Care.初级保健中的人格障碍:对协作护理中抑郁症治疗结果的影响
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):233-238. doi: 10.1177/2150131917714929. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Inter-relationship of the functional status question of the PHQ-9 and depression remission after six months of collaborative care management.PHQ-9 功能状态问题与协同护理管理六个月后抑郁缓解的相关性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Mar;47(3):418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
7
Patient self-assessment factors predictive of persistent depressive symptoms 6 months after enrollment in collaborative care management.患者自我评估因素预测协作式护理管理登记后 6 个月的持续抑郁症状。
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Feb;30(2):143-8. doi: 10.1002/da.22020. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
8
Patient body mass index does not predict six-month clinical outcome of depression managed under collaborative care.患者体重指数无法预测在协作护理模式下管理的抑郁症患者的六个月临床结局。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):119-23. doi: 10.1177/2150131912454012. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
9
Age of depressed patient does not affect clinical outcome in collaborative care management.抑郁患者的年龄并不影响协作式护理管理的临床结局。
Postgrad Med. 2011 Sep;123(5):122-8. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.09.2467.
10
The Impact of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder on the 6-Month Outcomes in Collaborative Care Management for Depression.创伤后应激障碍对抑郁症协作护理管理6个月结局的影响。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2016 Jul;7(3):159-64. doi: 10.1177/2150131916638329. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluate the prevalence of depression in type 2 diabetics with microvascular complications.评估伴有微血管并发症的2型糖尿病患者中抑郁症的患病率。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):3060-3064. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_123_20. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Depression Outcomes in Smokers and Nonsmokers: Comparison of Collaborative Care Management Versus Usual Care.吸烟者与非吸烟者的抑郁结局:协作式护理管理与常规护理的比较
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719861265. doi: 10.1177/2150132719861265.
3
Collaborative Care Management Associated With Improved Depression Outcomes in Patients With Personality Disorders, Compared to Usual Primary Care.
与常规初级护理相比,协作式护理管理与人格障碍患者抑郁症状改善相关。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2018 Jan-Dec;9:2150132718773266. doi: 10.1177/2150132718773266.