France C P, Woods J H
Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990 Aug;254(2):626-32.
Discriminative stimulus effects of opioid agonists were studied in morphine-dependent (10.0 mg/kg/day) pigeons discriminating among i.m. injections of morphine (10.0 mg/kg), saline and naltrexone (0.032 mg/kg) while responding under a fixed ratio schedule of food presentation. Morphine and naltrexone occasioned responding on the respective correct keys in a dose-related manner with complete generalization (greater than or equal to 90% correct) occurring with doses of morphine larger than 10.0 mg/kg and doses of naltrexone larger than 0.001 mg/kg. Several opioid mu and kappa agonists were studied in dependent pigeons and in morphine-abstinent pigeons (i.e., 30-hr morphine-deprived). The opioid mu agonist etonitazene substituted completely for morphine in dependent pigeons; in abstinent pigeons a small dose of etonitazine reversed withdrawal and larger doses substituted for morphine. Some opioid agonists did not substitute completely for morphine in dependent pigeons and partially (nalbuphine, meperidine) or completely (butorphanol, buprenorphine) reversed withdrawal in abstinent pigeons. In contrast, the opioid kappa agonists trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N(2-[1-pyrrolidinyl]cyclohexyl) benzeneacetamide methanesulfonate and bremazocine did not substitute for morphine or for naltrexone in dependent pigeons and did not reverse withdrawal in abstinent pigeons. Moreover, in dependent pigeons buprenorphine, butorphanol and nalbuphine, but not trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N(2-[1-pyrrolidinyl]cyclohexyl)benzeneace tam ide methanesulfonate, antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine and of naltrexone. These results confirm in morphine-dependent pigeons qualitative differences in discriminative stimulus effects among mu and kappa opioid agonists and support the notion that differences among agonists under some conditions can result from variations in efficacy.
在依赖吗啡(10.0毫克/千克/天)的鸽子中研究了阿片类激动剂的辨别刺激效应,这些鸽子在固定比率的食物呈现时间表下做出反应时,对皮下注射吗啡(10.0毫克/千克)、生理盐水和纳曲酮(0.032毫克/千克)进行辨别。吗啡和纳曲酮以剂量相关的方式引发在各自正确按键上的反应,当吗啡剂量大于10.0毫克/千克且纳曲酮剂量大于0.001毫克/千克时会出现完全泛化(大于或等于90%正确)。在依赖的鸽子和吗啡戒断的鸽子(即30小时未给予吗啡)中研究了几种阿片类μ和κ激动剂。阿片类μ激动剂依托尼嗪在依赖的鸽子中完全替代了吗啡;在戒断的鸽子中,小剂量的依托尼嗪可逆转戒断反应,大剂量则可替代吗啡。一些阿片类激动剂在依赖的鸽子中不能完全替代吗啡,在戒断的鸽子中部分(纳布啡、哌替啶)或完全(布托啡诺、丁丙诺啡)逆转戒断反应。相比之下,阿片类κ激动剂反式-3,4-二氯-N-甲基-N(2-[1-吡咯烷基]环己基)苯乙酰胺甲磺酸盐和布瑞马佐辛在依赖的鸽子中不能替代吗啡或纳曲酮,在戒断的鸽子中也不能逆转戒断反应。此外,在依赖的鸽子中,丁丙诺啡、布托啡诺和纳布啡,但不是反式-3,4-二氯-N-甲基-N(2-[1-吡咯烷基]环己基)苯乙酰胺甲磺酸盐,拮抗了吗啡和纳曲酮的辨别刺激效应。这些结果证实了在依赖吗啡的鸽子中,μ和κ阿片类激动剂在辨别刺激效应上存在质的差异,并支持了在某些条件下激动剂之间的差异可能源于效能变化这一观点。