• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙确诊念珠菌血症和其他侵袭性念珠菌感染中阿尼芬净的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of anidulafungin in confirmed candidaemia and other invasive Candida infections in Spain.

机构信息

Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Mycol Med. 2013 Sep;23(3):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.mycmed.2013.05.004
PMID:23849341
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Candidaemia and invasive Candida infections can cause patient death and are expensive. Anidulafungin, a newly-licensed candin, has proven effective in treating candidaemia. Our study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of anidulafungin compared with fluconazole, the current standard of care, for treating invasive candidiasis and candidaemia in Spain.

METHODS

A decision tree model from the hospital perspective was constructed to examine the cost-effectiveness of anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in treating confirmed candidaemia. Treatment success, patient treatment patterns, and patient survival were based on the results from a randomised, double-blind multicentre trial (Reboli et al., 2007 [41]). Only in-hospital (2011 €) direct costs per-patient obtained from a Spanish national database were considered. Renal toxicity probabilities and costs were extracted from the published literature. The incremental cost per successfully treated patient was calculated. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness.

RESULTS

The percentage of successfully treated patients was higher with anidulafungin than with fluconazole (74% versus 57%). Treatment with anidulafungin resulted in higher antifungal drug costs (5991€ versus 3149€) but lower overall costs (40047€ versus 41350€) due to reductions in other medical costs. Univariate sensitivity analyses showed that anidulafungin was the most cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Anidulafungin demonstrated improved clinical efficacy versus fluconazole in treating confirmed candidaemia. Despite increased drug costs, treating confirmed candidaemia with anidulafungin is a cost-effective strategy.

摘要

背景

念珠菌血症和侵袭性念珠菌感染可导致患者死亡,且费用高昂。安尼卡fungin(一种新批准的 Candin)已被证明对治疗念珠菌血症有效。我们的研究评估了安尼卡fungin 与氟康唑(目前的标准治疗方法)治疗西班牙侵袭性念珠菌病和念珠菌血症的成本效益。

方法

从医院角度构建决策树模型,以检查安尼卡fungin 与氟康唑治疗确诊念珠菌血症的成本效益。治疗成功率、患者治疗模式和患者生存率基于一项随机、双盲、多中心试验(Reboli 等人,2007 年[41])的结果。仅考虑从西班牙国家数据库获得的每位患者的住院(2011 欧元)直接成本。从已发表的文献中提取肾功能毒性的概率和成本。计算成功治疗的每位患者的增量成本。进行了单因素敏感性分析以测试模型的稳健性。

结果

与氟康唑相比,安尼卡fungin 治疗的成功患者比例更高(74%对 57%)。使用安尼卡fungin 治疗导致抗真菌药物成本更高(5991 欧元对 3149 欧元),但总成本更低(40047 欧元对 41350 欧元),因为其他医疗费用减少。单因素敏感性分析表明,安尼卡fungin 是最具成本效益的。

结论

与氟康唑相比,安尼卡fungin 治疗确诊念珠菌血症的临床疗效有所改善。尽管药物成本增加,但使用安尼卡fungin 治疗确诊念珠菌血症是一种具有成本效益的策略。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of anidulafungin in confirmed candidaemia and other invasive Candida infections in Spain.西班牙确诊念珠菌血症和其他侵袭性念珠菌感染中阿尼芬净的成本效益分析。
J Mycol Med. 2013 Sep;23(3):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis.阿尼芬净治疗念珠菌血症及其他侵袭性念珠菌病的成本效益分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 26;15:463. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1143-1.
3
Resource utilization and cost of treatment with anidulafungin or fluconazole for candidaemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: focus on critically ill patients.棘白菌素类药物(阿尼芬净)与氟康唑治疗念珠菌血症和其他侵袭性念珠菌病的资源利用与治疗费用:关注重症患者。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Aug;29(8):705-17. doi: 10.2165/11584810-000000000-00000.
4
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of antifungal therapy for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis caused by Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species.白色念珠菌和非白色念珠菌引起的侵袭性念珠菌病初始治疗抗真菌疗法的药物经济学分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2573-8.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis.安尼卡群(anidulafungin)与氟康唑治疗侵袭性念珠菌病的成本效益分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Aug;66(8):1906-15. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr186. Epub 2011 May 30.
6
Economic evaluation of micafungin versus caspofungin for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis.米卡芬净与卡泊芬净治疗念珠菌血症和侵袭性念珠菌病的经济学评价。
Intern Med J. 2013 Jun;43(6):668-77. doi: 10.1111/imj.12110.
7
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of micafungin versus caspofungin as definitive therapy for candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey.评估米卡芬净与卡泊芬净作为土耳其念珠菌血症和侵袭性念珠菌病(IC)确定性治疗药物的药物经济学评价。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;37(3):537-544. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3147-9. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anidulafungin vs fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey.土耳其棘白菌素与氟康唑治疗侵袭性念珠菌病(IC)的成本效果分析。
Mycoses. 2017 Nov;60(11):714-722. doi: 10.1111/myc.12651. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
Echinocandins in the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis: clinical and economic perspectives.棘白菌素类药物治疗念珠菌血症和侵袭性念珠菌病:临床和经济观点。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Mar;43(3):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
10
Economic evaluation of micafungin vs. liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC).棘白菌素类药物米卡芬净与两性霉素 B 脂质体(LAmB)治疗念珠菌血症和侵袭性念珠菌病(IC)的经济学评价。
Mycoses. 2013 Sep;56(5):532-42. doi: 10.1111/myc.12071. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-economic modelling of cost savings due to the use of rezafungin based on a German cost-of-illness study of candidiasis.基于德国念珠菌病疾病成本研究的瑞扎芬净使用成本节约的卫生经济模型。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Jun 19;5(3):dlad079. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad079. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of micafungin versus caspofungin as definitive therapy for candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey.评估米卡芬净与卡泊芬净作为土耳其念珠菌血症和侵袭性念珠菌病(IC)确定性治疗药物的药物经济学评价。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;37(3):537-544. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3147-9. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
3
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of antifungal therapy for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis caused by Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species.
白色念珠菌和非白色念珠菌引起的侵袭性念珠菌病初始治疗抗真菌疗法的药物经济学分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2573-8.
4
Cost-effectiveness of three echinocandins and fluconazole in the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in nonneutropenic adult patients.三种棘白菌素类药物与氟康唑治疗非中性粒细胞减少成年患者念珠菌血症和/或侵袭性念珠菌病的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Oct 13;7:527-35. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S91587. eCollection 2015.