Santanelli Fabio, Longo Benedetto, Cagli Barbara, Pugliese Pierfrancesco, Sorotos Michial, Paolini Guido
From the *Plastic Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, and †Master's Student on Breast Reconstruction, School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jan;74(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828d994d.
Although success rate of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction has greatly improved, complications still occasionally occur. Perfusion-related complications (PRCs) (ie, fat necrosis and partial flap necrosis) are the most frequent concern, affecting aesthetic final result of the reconstructed breast. The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate 287 consecutive DIEP flap breast reconstructions to investigate predictive and protective factors for PRCs.From May 2004 to February 2012, 287 DIEP flap breast reconstructions were performed on 270 patients; 247 unilateral flaps, including Holm vascular zones I to III, were retrospectively selected and analyzed. Tobacco use, mean blood pressure over the first postoperative 48 hours, superficial epigastric vein drainage, medial/lateral row perforator, nulliparity, crystalloid versus combined crystalloid/colloid intravenous fluid infusion therapy, and learning curve were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.Perfusion-related complications occurred 32 (12.9%) times, 79 (31.9%) patients were smokers, 48 (19.4%) showed postoperative mean blood pressure less than 75 mm Hg, 29 (11.7%) were nulliparous, and 173 (70%) had superficial epigastric vein drainage. Selected perforators were 110 (44.5%) from lateral row, 137 (55.5%) from medial row; 91 (36.8%) received crystalloid fluid infusion, whereas 156 (63.2%) combined crystalloid/colloid fluid infusion. From univariate analysis emerged significance of nulliparity, perforator row and intravenous fluid infusion for PRC. Nevertheless, multivariate model confirmed only nulliparity as a significant risk factor (P = 0.029), although variable correlations to other predictors were found: both medial row perforator and combined crystalloid/colloid fluid infusion potentially decrease the PRC risk of 11.6% and 27.6%, respectively. Learning curve did not show significant decrease of PRC risk over time.Our study first proved nulliparity as a statistically significant predictor for PRCs in DIEP flap breast reconstruction, possibly due to different superficial abdominal perfusion between pluriparous and nulliparous women, with potential weaker pattern of perforators and smaller angiosomes in the latter. The choice of medial row perforators and combined crystalloid/colloid fluid infusion might reduce PRC risk.
尽管腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建的成功率有了很大提高,但并发症仍偶尔会发生。灌注相关并发症(PRCs)(即脂肪坏死和部分皮瓣坏死)是最常见的问题,会影响乳房重建的美学最终效果。我们研究的目的是回顾性调查连续287例DIEP皮瓣乳房重建病例,以探究PRCs的预测因素和保护因素。
2004年5月至2012年2月,对270例患者进行了287例DIEP皮瓣乳房重建手术;回顾性选取并分析了247例单侧皮瓣,包括霍尔姆血管区域I至III。通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析评估吸烟情况、术后48小时内的平均血压、腹壁浅静脉引流情况、内侧/外侧排穿支、未生育情况、晶体液与晶体液/胶体液联合静脉输液治疗以及学习曲线。
发生灌注相关并发症32次(12.9%),79例(31.9%)患者吸烟,48例(19.4%)术后平均血压低于75 mmHg,29例(11.7%)未生育,173例(70%)有腹壁浅静脉引流。所选穿支中,110例(44.5%)来自外侧排,137例(55.5%)来自内侧排;91例(36.8%)接受晶体液输注,而156例(63.2%)接受晶体液/胶体液联合输注。单因素分析显示未生育、穿支行别和静脉输液对PRC有显著意义。然而,多因素模型仅证实未生育是一个显著的危险因素(P = 0.029),尽管发现与其他预测因素存在变量相关性:内侧排穿支和晶体液/胶体液联合输注分别可能使PRC风险降低11.6%和27.6%。学习曲线未显示PRC风险随时间有显著降低。
我们的研究首次证明未生育是DIEP皮瓣乳房重建中PRCs的一个具有统计学意义的预测因素,可能是由于经产妇和未生育女性腹部浅层灌注不同,后者穿支模式可能较弱且血管体较小。选择内侧排穿支和晶体液/胶体液联合输注可能会降低PRC风险。