Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Sep;23(7):1266-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829f1857.
The criterion standard of practice for gynecologists is to measure the endometrial thickness with ultrasonography in women presenting with postmenopausal bleeding. A recent study reported that a thin endometrial stripe upon ultrasonography did not reliably exclude type II endometrial carcinoma. The aim of the present study was to reevaluate the reliability of ultrasonographic measurement of the endometrium for prediction of endometrial carcinomas of both types I and II in postmenopausal women.
We collected clinical data from patients with endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan, during our study period from 2010 to 2012. Only the postmenopausal cases were included in our study. We excluded cases with insufficient clinical data.
Preoperative measurement of the endometrium by transvaginal ultrasonography revealed that the endometrium was greater than 4 mm in 80 (89%) of the 90 type I cases and in 41 (93%) of the 44 type II cases. The median of the endometrial thickness measured with transvaginal ultrasonography preoperatively in type I cases, including both patients with myometrial invasion less than 1/2 and those with myometrial invasion greater than 1/2, was 13 mm (range, 1-78 mm). That of type II cases was 15 mm (range, 1-54 mm). This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.46 by Mann-Whitney U test). These results implied that endometrial thickness was not significantly associated with the type of tumors.
Ultrasonographic measurements of the endometrium for prediction of endometrial carcinomas in postmenopausal women are reliable for both type I and type II tumors. These results encourage us to continue to use the "4-mm (5-mm) rule" to evaluate endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women, in opposition to a previous report.
妇科医生的临床实践标准是通过超声测量绝经后出血妇女的子宫内膜厚度。最近的一项研究报告称,超声检查显示子宫内膜薄并不能可靠排除 II 型子宫内膜癌。本研究旨在重新评估超声测量子宫内膜对绝经后妇女 I 型和 II 型子宫内膜癌的预测可靠性。
我们收集了 2010 年至 2012 年期间在日本大阪大学医院妇产科接受手术治疗的子宫内膜癌患者的临床资料。仅纳入绝经后患者。排除临床资料不足的病例。
经阴道超声术前测量子宫内膜显示,90 例 I 型病例中 80 例(89%)和 44 例 II 型病例中 41 例(93%)的子宫内膜大于 4mm。经阴道超声术前测量 I 型病例(包括肌层浸润小于 1/2 和大于 1/2 的患者)子宫内膜厚度的中位数为 13mm(范围 1-78mm)。II 型病例的子宫内膜厚度中位数为 15mm(范围 1-54mm)。差异无统计学意义(Mann-Whitney U 检验,P=0.46)。这些结果表明子宫内膜厚度与肿瘤类型无显著相关性。
超声测量绝经后妇女子宫内膜厚度对预测 I 型和 II 型子宫内膜癌具有可靠性。这些结果鼓励我们继续使用“4mm(5mm)规则”来评估绝经后妇女的子宫内膜厚度,与之前的报告相反。