Huddle Thomas S
J Med Philos. 2013 Aug;38(4):369-87. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht024.
Contemporary accounts of medical ethics and professionalism emphasize the importance of social justice as an ideal for physicians. This ideal is often specified as a commitment to attaining the universal availability of some level of health care, if not of other elements of a "decent minimum" standard of living. I observe that physicians, in general, have not accepted the importance of social justice for professional ethics, and I further argue that social justice does not belong among professional norms. Social justice is a norm of civic rather than professional life; professional groups may demand that their members conform to the requirements of citizenship but ought not to require civic virtues such as social justice. Nor should any such requirements foreclose reasonable disagreement as to the content of civic norms, as requiring adherence to common specifications of social justice would do. Demands for any given form of social justice among physicians are unlikely to bear fruit as medical education is powerless to produce this virtue.
当代关于医学伦理和职业精神的论述强调社会正义作为医生理想的重要性。这一理想通常被具体化为致力于实现某种程度的医疗保健普遍可及,即便不是实现“体面最低限度”生活标准的其他要素。我注意到,总体而言,医生并未接受社会正义对职业道德的重要性,而且我进一步认为社会正义不属于职业规范。社会正义是公民生活而非职业生活的规范;专业团体可以要求其成员遵守公民身份的要求,但不应要求诸如社会正义之类的公民美德。任何此类要求也不应排除对公民规范内容的合理分歧,因为要求遵守社会正义的共同具体规定就会如此。医生中对任何特定形式社会正义的要求不太可能产生效果,因为医学教育无力培养这种美德。