Suppr超能文献

当在流产中诊断染色体异常时,常规核型分析(conventional karyotyping)之外的染色体微阵列分析(chromosomal microarray analysis,CMA)提供的额外信息:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Academic Department, Birmingham Women's Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birminghmam, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12382. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of spontaneous miscarriages are associated with chromosome abnormalities. Identification of these karyotypic abnormalities helps to estimate recurrence risks in future pregnancies. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is transforming clinical cytogenetic practice with its ability to examine the human genome at increasingly high resolution.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether CMA testing on the products of conception following miscarriage provides better diagnostic information compared with conventional karyotyping.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE (from 1996 to December 2012), EMBASE (from 1974 to December 2012), and CINAHL (from 1996 to December 2012) databases were searched electronically.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were selected if CMA was used on products of conception following miscarriage, alongside conventional karyotyping.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Nine papers were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using stata 11.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

MAIN RESULTS

There was agreement between CMA and karyotyping in 86.0% of cases (95% CI 77.0-96.0%). CMA detected 13% (95% CI 8.0-21.0) additional chromosome abnormalities over conventional full karyotyping. In addition, traditional, full karyotyping detected 3% (95% CI 1.0-10.0%) additional abnormalities over CMA. The incidence of a variant of unknown significance (VOUS) being detected was 2% (95% CI 1.0-10.0%).

AUTHOR'S CONCLUSIONS: Compared with karyotyping, there appears to be an increased detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities when CMA is used to analyse the products of conception; however, some of these abnormalities are VOUS, and this information should be provided when counselling women following miscarriage and when taking consent for the analysis of miscarriage products by CMA.

摘要

背景

大约 50%的自然流产与染色体异常有关。识别这些核型异常有助于估计未来妊娠的复发风险。染色体微阵列分析(CMA)通过其以越来越高的分辨率检查人类基因组的能力,正在改变临床细胞遗传学实践。

目的

本研究旨在确定与传统核型分析相比,流产后妊娠产物的 CMA 检测是否提供了更好的诊断信息。

检索策略

电子检索 MEDLINE(1996 年至 2012 年 12 月)、EMBASE(1974 年至 2012 年 12 月)和 CINAHL(1996 年至 2012 年 12 月)数据库。

选择标准

如果 CMA 用于流产后的妊娠产物,并且与传统核型分析一起使用,则选择研究。

数据收集和分析

系统评价和荟萃分析共纳入 9 篇论文。所有统计分析均使用 stata 11.0(StataCorp.,College Station,TX,USA)进行。

主要结果

CMA 和核型在 86.0%的病例中一致(95%CI 77.0-96.0%)。CMA 比传统的全染色体核型分析检测到 13%(95%CI 8.0-21.0%)的额外染色体异常。此外,传统的全染色体核型分析比 CMA 检测到 3%(95%CI 1.0-10.0%)的额外异常。未知意义的变异(VOUS)的检出率为 2%(95%CI 1.0-10.0%)。

作者的结论

与核型分析相比,当使用 CMA 分析妊娠产物时,染色体异常的检出率似乎有所增加;然而,其中一些异常是 VOUS,在对流产后妇女进行咨询时,以及在获得同意对流产产物进行 CMA 分析时,应提供这些信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验