Bruylands Michelle, Paans Wolter, Hediger Hannele, Müller-Staub Maria
University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland.
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2013 Oct;24(3):163-70. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-3095.2013.01248.x. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
To evaluate the effect of the educational program "Guided Clinical Reasoning" (GCR) and the introduction of an intelligent electronic nursing documentation system (e-doc) on the quality of the nursing process.
Evaluation was conducted at three measurement points and rated with the instrument "Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes" (Q-DIO).
GCR showed the best Q-DIO-scores. No long-term effect was found after GCR cessation. The e-doc delivered the lowest scores, while showing adequate support in using nursing diagnoses.
E-docs can support conducting the nursing process, but for meaningful e-doc use, clinical reasoning is essential.
High-quality nursing documentation requires recognition of factors obstructing or supporting nurses in the use of e-docs while conducting the nursing process.
评估“引导式临床推理”(GCR)教育项目以及引入智能电子护理文档系统(电子文档)对护理过程质量的影响。
在三个测量点进行评估,并使用“护理诊断、干预和结果质量”(Q - DIO)工具进行评分。
GCR显示出最佳的Q - DIO分数。GCR停止后未发现长期影响。电子文档得分最低,不过在使用护理诊断方面提供了充分支持。
电子文档可支持护理过程的开展,但为了有效使用电子文档,临床推理至关重要。
高质量的护理文档需要认识到在护理过程中阻碍或支持护士使用电子文档的因素。