Children's Heart Centre, British Columbia Children's Hospital, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Children's Heart Centre, British Columbia Children's Hospital, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Oct;26(10):1221-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
Invasive studies have shown that children with Fontan palliation have abnormal arterial stiffness, impedance, and hydraulic power and efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess these indexes noninvasively in a cohort of children with Fontan circulation using Doppler echocardiography and compare their results with those of healthy peers.
This was a case-control study of 22 Fontan patients and 31 healthy control children. Using standard two-dimensional, M-mode, and Doppler echocardiographic imaging and carotid artery applanation tonometry, aortic flows, dimensions, and pulse-wave velocity were measured, and vascular impedance and arterial stiffness were calculated. Hydraulic power and efficiency were calculated from standard fluid dynamics formulae.
The median age was similar between groups. Stroke volume index (39 vs 39 mL/min/m(2)) and cardiac index (2.6 vs 2.5 L/min/m(2)) were similar. Aortic cross-sectional area (3.3 vs 2.8 cm(2)), peak aortic flow (302 vs 261 cm(3)/sec), and myocardial performance index (0.47 vs 0.25) were higher and ejection fraction (50% vs 66%) was lower in Fontan patients. Input impedance (61 vs 83 dyne · sec/cm(5)/m(2)) was lower in Fontan patients. Pulse-wave velocity (488 vs 364 cm/sec), elastic pressure-strain modulus (305 vs 263 torr), and stiffness index (4.15 vs 3.04) were higher in Fontan patients. Total arterial compliance (1.29 vs 1.32 mL/torr/m(2)) and mean power (606 vs 527 mW/m(2)) were similar and total hydraulic power (716 vs 627 mW/m(2)) was higher in Fontan patients. Efficiency and the power cost per unit of forward flow were similar.
Despite stiffer aortas, Fontan patients generate more hydraulic power associated with decreased ventricular function to achieve a similar hydraulic efficiency. In Fontan patients, therapy that is given to improve ventricular function may need to target vascular stiffness as well. This technique may be used to monitor the efficacy of therapeutic interventions.
有创研究表明,Fontan 姑息术后的儿童存在动脉僵硬度、阻抗和水力功率及效率异常。本研究旨在使用多普勒超声心动图无创评估 Fontan 循环患儿的这些指标,并与健康同龄儿进行比较。
这是一项 Fontan 患者 22 例和健康对照儿童 31 例的病例对照研究。采用二维、M 型和多普勒超声心动图成像以及颈动脉平板测压法测量主动脉流量、内径和脉搏波速度,并计算血管阻抗和动脉僵硬度。水力功率和效率根据标准流体动力学公式计算。
两组的中位年龄相似。两组的每搏量指数(39 比 39 mL/min/m²)和心排血量指数(2.6 比 2.5 L/min/m²)相似。Fontan 组的主动脉截面积(3.3 比 2.8 cm²)、峰值主动脉流量(302 比 261 cm³/sec)和心肌做功指数(0.47 比 0.25)较高,射血分数(50%比 66%)较低。Fontan 组的输入阻抗(61 比 83 dyne·sec/cm 5/m²)较低。Fontan 组的脉搏波速度(488 比 364 cm/sec)、弹性压力-应变模量(305 比 263 torr)和僵硬度指数(4.15 比 3.04)较高。总动脉顺应性(1.29 比 1.32 mL/torr/m²)和平均功率(606 比 527 mW/m²)相似,而 Fontan 组的总水力功率(716 比 627 mW/m²)较高。效率和单位前向流量的功率消耗相似。
尽管 Fontan 组的主动脉僵硬度增加,但为了达到相似的水力效率,他们产生了更多的水力功率,这与心室功能降低有关。在 Fontan 患者中,改善心室功能的治疗可能需要针对血管僵硬度。这种技术可用于监测治疗干预的效果。