• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全腹腔镜子宫切除术患者阴道残端闭合中单向倒刺缝线与聚乙醇酸910缝线的比较。

Comparison between unidirectional barbed and polyglactin 910 suture in vaginal cuff closure in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

作者信息

Morgan-Ortiz Fred, Contreras-Soto Juan Omar, Soto-Pineda Juan M, Zepeda Marco A López A López, Peraza-Garay Felipe J

机构信息

Laparoscopic Diploma Course Program Coordinator Investigation and Teaching Center for Health Sciences Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan Civil Hospital Sinaloa, Mexico.

Investigation and Teaching Center for Health Sciences Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan Civil Hospital, Sinaloa, Mexico.

出版信息

Surg Technol Int. 2013 Sep;23:143-8.

PMID:23860935
Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of barbed unidirectional vs. polyglactin 910 suture in vaginal cuff closure on patients submitted to total laparoscopic hysterectomy. From November 2011 until March 2012, a prolective, comparative, longitudinal, non-randomized study was performed on patients submitted to total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). On entry, patients were assigned to two different groups, Group 1: Vaginal cuff closure with unidirectional #00 (n = 25) barbed suture, and Group 2: Vaginal cuff closure with polyglactin 910 #1 suture. The length of closure time and the frequency of dehiscence in vaginal vault were measured on the 14th postoperative day. We did not find significant differences between the groups on the general characteristic analysis. However, significant differences were found (P = .029) in the average vaginal cuff closure time (12.7 ± 3.1 min. for barbed suture group vs. 20.4 ± 7.1 min. for polyglactin 910 group). No dehiscence case was found in any group. Based on the results of this study, we can conclude that unidirectional barbed suture reduces the surgical time for vaginal cuff closure during total laparoscopic hysterectomy and doesn't increase the vaginal cuff dehiscence risk.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较倒刺单向缝线与聚乙醇酸910缝线在全腹腔镜子宫切除术中阴道残端闭合的有效性和安全性。2011年11月至2012年3月,对接受全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)的患者进行了一项前瞻性、比较性、纵向、非随机研究。纳入时,患者被分为两组,第1组:用单向#00(n = 25)倒刺缝线进行阴道残端闭合,第2组:用聚乙醇酸910 #1缝线进行阴道残端闭合。在术后第14天测量阴道穹窿的闭合时间长度和裂开频率。在一般特征分析中,我们未发现两组之间存在显著差异。然而,在平均阴道残端闭合时间上发现了显著差异(P = .029)(倒刺缝线组为12.7 ± 3.1分钟,聚乙醇酸910组为20.4 ± 7.1分钟)。两组均未发现裂开病例。基于本研究结果,我们可以得出结论,倒刺单向缝线可减少全腹腔镜子宫切除术中阴道残端闭合的手术时间,且不会增加阴道残端裂开风险。

相似文献

1
Comparison between unidirectional barbed and polyglactin 910 suture in vaginal cuff closure in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术患者阴道残端闭合中单向倒刺缝线与聚乙醇酸910缝线的比较。
Surg Technol Int. 2013 Sep;23:143-8.
2
Barbed Suture versus Conventional Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.经阴道全腹腔镜子宫切除术中使用倒刺缝线与传统缝线关闭阴道边缘:随机对照临床试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Sep-Oct;26(6):1104-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.08.030. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
3
Barbed versus standard suture: a randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.倒刺缝线与普通缝线在腹腔镜阴道残端关闭中的随机对照试验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 May 14.
4
Comparison of barbed unidirectional suture with figure-of-eight standard sutures in vaginal cuff closure in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术中倒刺单向缝线与8字标准缝线用于阴道残端闭合的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;38(6):842-847. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1416597. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
5
Laparoscopic vs transvaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial by the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy.腹腔镜与经阴道子宫颈残端关闭术在全腹腔镜子宫切除术后的比较:意大利妇科内镜学会的一项随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):500.e1-500.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.029. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
V-Loc™ 180 suture in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study comparing Polysorb to barbed suture used for vaginal cuff closure.V-Loc™ 180缝线在全腹腔镜子宫切除术中的应用:一项比较用于阴道断端闭合的聚乙醇酸缝线与倒刺缝线的回顾性研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Dec;207:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
7
A Retrospective Review of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence: Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures.阴道边缘裂开的回顾性研究:可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
8
Decreased incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence after laparoscopic closure with bidirectional barbed suture.腹腔镜下双向倒刺缝线缝合降低了阴道残端裂开的发生率。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.002.
9
Dramatically reduced incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence in gynecologic patients undergoing endoscopic closure with barbed sutures: A retrospective cohort study.经内镜使用带倒刺缝线缝合的妇科患者中,显著降低了阴道残端裂开的发生率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jul;19:27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Unidirectional barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure without backward stitch in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术中用于阴道残端闭合的单向倒刺缝线,无需反向缝合。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Sep;44(9):1793-1799. doi: 10.1111/jog.13696. Epub 2018 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of a novel unidirectional mid-term absorbable barbed suture versus a competitor barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure after gynaecology surgery, study protocol of a randomized controlled trial - BARHYSTER.一项关于新型单向中期可吸收倒刺缝线与一种对照倒刺缝线用于妇科手术后阴道残端闭合的评估——随机对照试验BARHYSTER的研究方案
BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02700-z.
2
Comparison of different suture techniques for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.不同缝合技术在腹腔镜阴道残端关闭中的比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 28;14(1):4860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55586-5.
3
Efficacy and safety of V-Loc barbed sutures versus conventional suture techniques in gynecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
V-Loc 倒刺缝线与传统缝合技术在妇科手术中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1249-1265. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07291-3. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
Barbed versus conventional 2-layer continuous running sutures for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.用于腹腔镜阴道断端闭合的倒刺缝线与传统两层连续缝合线的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(39):e4981. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004981.
5
Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed absorbable sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 242 patients.使用免打结倒刺可吸收缝线进行腹腔镜胃肠道吻合术是安全且可重复的:一项针对242例患者的单中心经验。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;46(4):329-35. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv212. Epub 2016 Jan 26.