Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Technical Audiology, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):481-93. doi: 10.1121/1.4807637.
The ability to use binaural cues when stimulation was by bilaterally applied bone conduction (BC) transducers was investigated in 20 normal hearing participants. The results with BC stimulation were compared with normal air conduction (AC) stimulation through earphones. The binaural hearing ability was tested by spatial release from masking, binaural intelligibility level difference (BILD), binaural masking level difference (BMLD) using chirp stimulation, and test of the precedence effect. In all tests, the participants revealed a benefit of bilateral BC stimulation indicating use of binaural cues. In the speech based tests, the binaural benefit for BC stimulation was approximately half that with AC stimulation. For the BC BMLD test with chirp stimulation, there were indications of superposition of the ipsilateral and contralateral pathways at the cochlear level affecting the results. The precedence effect test indicated significantly worse results for BC stimulation than for AC stimulation with low-frequency stimulation while they were close for high-frequency stimulation; broad-band stimulation gave results that were slightly worse than the high-frequency results.
本研究调查了 20 名正常听力者在双侧应用骨导(BC)换能器刺激时使用双耳线索的能力。将 BC 刺激的结果与通过耳机进行的正常空气传导(AC)刺激进行了比较。通过空间掩蔽释放、双耳可懂度差值(BILD)、使用啁啾刺激的双耳掩蔽级差(BMLD)以及优先效应测试来测试双耳听力能力。在所有测试中,参与者都表现出双侧 BC 刺激的益处,表明他们使用了双耳线索。在基于语音的测试中,BC 刺激的双耳益处约为 AC 刺激的一半。对于使用啁啾刺激的 BC BMLD 测试,有迹象表明同侧和对侧通路在耳蜗水平上的叠加会影响结果。优先效应测试表明,低频刺激时 BC 刺激的结果明显差于 AC 刺激,而高频刺激时则接近;宽带刺激的结果略差于高频结果。