Suppr超能文献

骨导双侧掩蔽释放空间对正常听力受试者的影响。

Spatial Release From Masking With Bilateral Bone Conduction Stimulation at Mastoid for Normal Hearing Subjects.

机构信息

School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241234202. doi: 10.1177/23312165241234202.

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of spatial release from masking (SRM) in bilateral bone conduction (BC) stimulation at the mastoid. Nine adults with normal hearing were tested to determine SRM based on speech recognition thresholds (SRTs) in simulated spatial configurations ranging from 0 to 180 degrees. These configurations were based on nonindividualized head-related transfer functions. The participants were subjected to sound stimulation through either air conduction (AC) via headphones or BC. The results indicated that both the angular separation between the target and the masker, and the modality of sound stimulation, significantly influenced speech recognition performance. As the angular separation between the target and the masker increased up to 150°, both BC and AC SRTs decreased, indicating improved performance. However, performance slightly deteriorated when the angular separation exceeded 150°. For spatial separations less than 75°, BC stimulation provided greater spatial benefits than AC, although this difference was not statistically significant. For separations greater than 75°, AC stimulation offered significantly more spatial benefits than BC. When speech and noise originated from the same side of the head, the "better ear effect" did not significantly contribute to SRM. However, when speech and noise were located on opposite sides of the head, this effect became dominant in SRM.

摘要

本研究探讨了在乳突双侧骨导(BC)刺激中空间掩蔽释放(SRM)的效果。9 名听力正常的成年人参与了测试,以根据模拟的空间配置确定基于言语识别阈值(SRT)的 SRM,这些配置基于非个体化头部相关传递函数。参与者通过耳机进行空气传导(AC)或 BC 声音刺激。结果表明,目标和掩蔽之间的角度分离以及声音刺激的方式都显著影响了言语识别性能。当目标和掩蔽之间的角度分离增加到 150°时,BC 和 AC 的 SRT 都降低了,表明性能有所提高。然而,当角度分离超过 150°时,性能略有恶化。对于小于 75°的空间分离,BC 刺激比 AC 提供了更大的空间优势,尽管这种差异没有统计学意义。对于大于 75°的分离,AC 刺激比 BC 提供了显著更多的空间优势。当语音和噪声来自头部的同一侧时,“好耳效应”对 SRM 的贡献不显著。然而,当语音和噪声位于头部的两侧时,这种效应在 SRM 中占主导地位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b245/10981249/4472fa5888ce/10.1177_23312165241234202-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验