Division of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 701 North First Street, Springfield, IL 62794, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jul 17;95(14):e100 1-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01312.
The future of orthopaedic surgery will be shaped by unprecedented demographic and economic challenges, necessitating movement to so-called "second curve" innovations in the delivery of care. Implementation of integrated care pathways (ICPs) may be one solution to imminent cost and access pressures facing orthopaedic patients in this era of health-care accountability and reform. ICPs can lower costs and the duration of hospital stay while facilitating better outcomes through enhanced interspecialty communication. As with any innovation at the crossroads of paradigm change, implementation of integrated care pathways for orthopaedics may elicit surgeons' concern on a variety of grounds and on levels ranging from casual questioning to vehement opposition. No single method is always effective in promoting cooperation and adoption, so a combination of strategies offers the best chance of success. With a special focus on total joint replacement, we consider general patterns of resistance to change, styles of conflict, and specific issues that may underlie orthopaedic surgeon resistance to implementation of integrated care pathways. Methods to facilitate and sustain orthopaedic surgeon engagement in implementation of such pathways are discussed.
未来的骨科手术将受到前所未有的人口和经济挑战的影响,需要在医疗服务提供方面进行所谓的“第二曲线”创新。在医疗保健问责制和改革的时代,实施综合护理路径(ICPs)可能是解决骨科患者当前面临的成本和获得途径压力的一种方法。通过加强专科间的沟通,ICPs 可以降低成本和住院时间,同时通过改善治疗效果。与范式转变交汇处的任何创新一样,骨科综合护理路径的实施可能会引起外科医生的各种担忧,其担忧程度从随意质疑到强烈反对不等。没有单一的方法总是能有效地促进合作和采用,因此,多种策略的结合提供了取得成功的最佳机会。我们特别关注全关节置换,考虑了对变革的一般抗拒模式、冲突风格以及可能导致骨科医生抗拒实施综合护理路径的具体问题。讨论了促进和维持骨科医生参与实施此类路径的方法。