Vamvakas E C, Hitzler W E
Transfusion Center, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Clin Lab. 2013;59(5-6):459-64.
To reduce the infectious and immunologic complications of platelet transfusions in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia, three interventions have aimed to decrease the number of prophylactic platelet transfusions received by such patients for the prevention of bleeding. These are the reduction of the platelet count threshold triggering prophylactic transfusion, the administration of low-dose (as opposed to standard-dose) platelet transfusions, and the administration of therapeutic (as opposed to prophylactic) platelet transfusions. We demonstrate that--in terms of absolute risk reduction in all infectious and some immunologic complications of transfusion--patients can benefit more from the transition to all-apheresis platelet supply than from the reduction of the platelet count threshold from 20,000/microL to 10,000/microL (mean reduction in the number of donor exposures by 26.28 versus 9.6, respectively). Also, patients can benefit just as much from the transition to an all-apheresis platelet supply as from the transition to a new standard of care employing therapeutic platelet transfusions for selected patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia (mean reduction in the number of donor exposures by 4.08 versus 3.24, respectively). Finally, policies of low-dose platelet transfusions can directly benefit patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia, effecting a median reduction in the number of donor exposures by 12.5 compared with a setting transfusing platelet pools, only if they are combined with Patient Blood Management (PBM) and an all-apheresis platelet supply. Thus, whatever strategy is adopted from among these three interventions, the replacement of the current platelet pools with an all-apheresis platelet supply is necessary for providing patients with the full benefit.
为减少增殖低下性血小板减少症患者血小板输注的感染性和免疫性并发症,有三种干预措施旨在减少此类患者为预防出血而接受的预防性血小板输注次数。这些措施包括降低触发预防性输血的血小板计数阈值、给予低剂量(而非标准剂量)血小板输注以及给予治疗性(而非预防性)血小板输注。我们证明,就所有输血感染性并发症和部分免疫性并发症的绝对风险降低而言,与将血小板计数阈值从20,000/微升降至10,000/微升相比(分别使供体暴露次数平均减少26.28次和9.6次),患者从过渡到全血单采血小板供应中获益更多。此外,与过渡到采用治疗性血小板输注的新护理标准相比(分别使供体暴露次数平均减少4.08次和3.24次),患者从过渡到全血单采血小板供应中获益程度相同,该新护理标准适用于部分增殖低下性血小板减少症患者。最后,低剂量血小板输注策略可直接使增殖低下性血小板减少症患者获益,与输注血小板池相比,若将其与患者血液管理(PBM)和全血单采血小板供应相结合,可使供体暴露次数中位数减少12.5次。因此,无论从这三种干预措施中采用何种策略,用全血单采血小板供应替代当前的血小板池对于让患者充分获益而言都是必要的。