• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重创伤性脑损伤死亡率模型:英国创伤登记处建模结果。

Models of mortality probability in severe traumatic brain injury: results of the modelling by the UK trauma registry.

机构信息

1 University of Manchester , Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN), Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom .

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2013 Dec 15;30(24):2021-30. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2988. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2013.2988
PMID:23865489
Abstract

Currently available prognostic models in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) are derived from historical data sets or from heterogeneous data sets, depending upon the trauma care delivered. The objective of our study was to develop models to predict survival in a recent cohort of TBI patients within a relatively homogeneous trauma care system. Records of patients with brain injury were extracted from the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database. The relationship of the variables (i.e., age, Glasgow Coma Score [GCS], pupillary reactivity, Injury Severity Score [ISS], Computed Tomography [CT] classifications, classification of various intracranial pathologies, systolic and mean blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and the presence of extracranial injury) to survival at discharge were determined. Stepwise logistical regression analysis was performed to determine the best prognostic model. Two models were derived from data of 802 patients (models A and B). Age, GCS, pupillary reactivity, hypoxia, and brainstem injury are significant predictors in both. However, model A contains ISS in contrast to model B, which contains the presence of brain swelling and major extracranial injury instead. Both models have good predictive performance (model A: area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic [ROC] curve [AUC]=0.92 [95% CI, 0.90-0.95], Nagelkerke R(2), 0.62; model B: AUC=0.93 [95% CI: 0.91-0.95], Nagelkerke R(2): 0.63). Hence, two accurate and reliable prognostic models were developed from a recent cohort of the TBI population.

摘要

目前,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的预后模型源自历史数据集或异质数据集,具体取决于所提供的创伤护理。我们的研究目的是在相对同质的创伤护理系统中,为最近的 TBI 患者队列开发预测生存率的模型。从创伤审核和研究网络(TARN)数据库中提取脑损伤患者的记录。确定变量(即年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷评分[GCS]、瞳孔反应、损伤严重程度评分[ISS]、计算机断层扫描[CT]分类、各种颅内病变分类、收缩压和平均血压、氧饱和度和颅外损伤的存在)与出院时生存率的关系。进行逐步逻辑回归分析以确定最佳预后模型。从 802 名患者的数据中得出了两个模型(模型 A 和 B)。年龄、GCS、瞳孔反应、缺氧和脑干损伤是两者的重要预测因素。然而,模型 A 包含 ISS,而模型 B 包含脑肿胀和主要颅外损伤的存在。这两个模型都具有良好的预测性能(模型 A:ROC 曲线下面积[AUC]=0.92[95%置信区间:0.90-0.95],Nagelkerke R(2):0.62;模型 B:AUC=0.93[95%置信区间:0.91-0.95],Nagelkerke R(2):0.63)。因此,从最近的 TBI 人群中开发了两个准确可靠的预后模型。

相似文献

1
Models of mortality probability in severe traumatic brain injury: results of the modelling by the UK trauma registry.严重创伤性脑损伤死亡率模型:英国创伤登记处建模结果。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Dec 15;30(24):2021-30. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.2988. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
2
Comparing model performance for survival prediction using total Glasgow Coma Scale and its components in traumatic brain injury.比较创伤性脑损伤中使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表及其各分量预测生存的模型性能。
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Jan 1;30(1):17-22. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2438. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
3
Validation of a prognostic score for early mortality in severe head injury cases.严重颅脑损伤病例早期死亡率预后评分的验证
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121(6):1314-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS131874. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
4
Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the IMPACT models and the role of extracranial injuries.中重度创伤性脑损伤的预后:IMPACT 模型的外部验证及颅外损伤的作用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):639-46. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d602e.
5
The predictive value of field versus arrival Glasgow Coma Scale score and TRISS calculations in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.现场与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分及创伤和损伤严重度评分计算在中重度创伤性脑损伤中的预测价值。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):985-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205860.96209.1c.
6
Analysis of long-term (median 10.5 years) outcomes in children presenting with traumatic brain injury and an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 or 4.对初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3或4分的创伤性脑损伤患儿的长期(中位时间10.5年)预后分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Oct;16(4):410-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.PEDS14679. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
7
Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: effect of blood alcohol concentration on Glasgow Coma Scale score and relation to computed tomography findings.中度和重度创伤性脑损伤:血液酒精浓度对格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的影响及其与计算机断层扫描结果的关系。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):211-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS14322.
8
A comparison of the prehospital motor component of the Glasgow coma scale (mGCS) to the prehospital total GCS (tGCS) as a prehospital risk adjustment measure for trauma patients.院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(mGCS)的运动成分与院前总格拉斯哥昏迷量表(tGCS)的比较,作为创伤患者的院前风险调整措施。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):68-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.844870.
9
Introduction of a novel trauma score.一种新型创伤评分的介绍。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1607-13. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318270d572.
10
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.

引用本文的文献

1
Cohort profile: The Trauma Outcomes Project, a prospective study of New Zealanders experiencing major trauma.队列资料简介:创伤结局项目,一项对新西兰重大创伤患者的前瞻性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 27;13(11):e075480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075480.
2
Justification of Indication for Cranial CT Imaging after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury According to the Current National Guidelines.根据现行国家指南对轻度创伤性脑损伤后进行颅脑CT成像的指征说明
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 23;13(11):1826. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111826.
3
Imputation strategies for missing baseline neurological assessment covariates after traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study.
创伤性脑损伤后缺失基线神经评估协变量的推断策略:CENTER-TBI 研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 6;16(8):e0253425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253425. eCollection 2021.
4
A protocol for the development of a prediction model in mild traumatic brain injury with CT scan abnormality: which patients are safe for discharge?一项关于开发伴有CT扫描异常的轻度创伤性脑损伤预测模型的方案:哪些患者可以安全出院?
Diagn Progn Res. 2018 Apr 20;2:6. doi: 10.1186/s41512-018-0027-4. eCollection 2018.
5
The Risk of Deterioration in GCS13-15 Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Identified by Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于计算机断层成像的 GCS13-15 创伤性脑损伤患者病情恶化风险的识别:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Mar 1;35(5):703-718. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5259. Epub 2018 Jan 11.