• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A cluster randomized controlled trial of the be the best you can be intervention: effects on the psychological and physical well-being of school children.一项“尽你所能”干预措施的整群随机对照试验:对学童心理和身体健康的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 17;13:666. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-666.
2
The West Midlands ActiVe lifestyle and healthy Eating in School children (WAVES) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted obesity prevention intervention programme targeted at children aged 6-7 years.西米德兰兹地区积极生活方式与儿童在校健康饮食研究(WAVES):一项针对 6-7 岁儿童的多方面肥胖预防干预计划的临床有效性和成本效益的集群随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Feb;22(8):1-608. doi: 10.3310/hta22080.
3
A quasi-experimental cross-disciplinary evaluation of the impacts of education outside the classroom on pupils' physical activity, well-being and learning: the TEACHOUT study protocol.一项关于课外教育对学生身体活动、幸福感和学习影响的准实验性跨学科评估:TEACHOUT研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 24;16(1):1117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3780-8.
4
An Internet-supported Physical Activity Intervention Delivered in Secondary Schools Located in Low Socio-economic Status Communities: Study Protocol for the Activity and Motivation in Physical Education (AMPED) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.一项在社会经济地位较低社区的中学开展的互联网支持的体育活动干预:体育活动与动机(AMPED)整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 6;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2583-7.
5
Lessons learned from the AFLY5 RCT process evaluation: implications for the design of physical activity and nutrition interventions in schools.从AFLY5随机对照试验过程评估中吸取的经验教训:对学校体育活动和营养干预设计的启示。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 23;15:946. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2293-1.
6
Increasing students' physical activity during school physical education: rationale and protocol for the SELF-FIT cluster randomized controlled trial.在学校体育课中增加学生的体育活动:SELF-FIT 整群随机对照试验的基本原理与方案
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 11;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4553-8.
7
Rationale, design and conduct of a comprehensive evaluation of a school-based peer-led anti-smoking intervention in the UK: the ASSIST cluster randomised trial [ISRCTN55572965].英国一项基于学校的同伴主导的戒烟干预综合评估的基本原理、设计与实施:ASSIST整群随机试验[ISRCTN55572965]
BMC Public Health. 2005 Apr 22;5:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-43.
8
Introducing physically active lessons in UK secondary schools: feasibility study and pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial.在英国中学引入体育活动课程:可行性研究和试点群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 6;9(5):e025080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025080.
9
10
A school-family blended multi-component physical activity program for Fundamental Motor Skills Promotion Program for Obese Children (FMSPPOC): protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.学校-家庭混合多组分体育活动方案促进肥胖儿童基本运动技能项目(FMSPPOC):一项群组随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15210-z.

引用本文的文献

1
A research synthesis on successful educational practices and student outcomes for physical education in schools.关于学校体育教育中成功教育实践与学生成果的研究综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 2;14:1280871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1280871. eCollection 2023.
2
Feasibility of implementing , a clinical decision support tool to improve extubation decision-making in the ICU: a mixed-methods observational study.实施一种临床决策支持工具以改善重症监护病房拔管决策的可行性:一项混合方法观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e045674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045674.
3
Psychological Wellbeing in Physical Education and School Sports: A Systematic Review.体育与学校体育中的心理健康:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 20;18(3):864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030864.
4
Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.针对年轻人多种风险行为的个人、家庭和学校层面的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 5;10(10):CD009927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009927.pub2.
5
Studies evaluating of health interventions at schools: an integrative literature review.学校健康干预措施的评估研究:一项综合文献综述。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Jul 16;26:e3008. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2463.3008.
6
Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study).医生在 ICU 中向替代决策人介绍研究是否有作用?(Approach 试验:一项试点混合方法研究)。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jan;41(1):58-67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3558-3. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
2
Clinimetric review of motion sensors in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年运动传感器的临床测量学综述
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;59(7):670-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.020.
3
Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents' academic achievement.考察内在目标框架与外在目标框架以及自主性支持型与内控型沟通方式对青少年早期学业成绩的动机影响。
Child Dev. 2005 Mar-Apr;76(2):483-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x.
4
Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts.激发学习、表现和坚持:内在目标内容与自主支持性环境的协同效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):246-60. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246.
5
Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: implications for quality of life assessment.积极幸福感与消极幸福感独立性的证据:对生活质量评估的启示
Br J Health Psychol. 2003 Feb;8(Pt 1):107-22. doi: 10.1348/135910703762879246.
6
Standardization of the 24-hour diet recall calibration method used in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC): general concepts and preliminary results.欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)中使用的24小时饮食回顾校准方法的标准化:一般概念和初步结果。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000 Dec;54(12):900-17. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601107.
7
On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being.论能量、个性与健康:主观活力作为幸福感的动态反映
J Pers. 1997 Sep;65(3):529-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x.
8
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note.优势与困难问卷:一篇研究笔记。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;38(5):581-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x.
9
Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: toward a motivational model of high school dropout.现实生活环境中的自我决定与坚持:迈向高中辍学的动机模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 May;72(5):1161-76. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1161.
10
Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory.医学生对生物心理社会价值观的内化:自我决定理论的一项检验
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Apr;70(4):767-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.767.

一项“尽你所能”干预措施的整群随机对照试验:对学童心理和身体健康的影响。

A cluster randomized controlled trial of the be the best you can be intervention: effects on the psychological and physical well-being of school children.

机构信息

Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 17;13:666. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-666.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-666
PMID:23866311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3733752/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 'Be the Best You Can Be' (BtBYCB) program is a school-based intervention designed to foster positive physical, psychological, and social development via empowering young people to take ownership over their own personal development. The aim of this work is to determine the effectiveness of the BtBYCB program on (i) pupils' well-being, self-perceptions, self-esteem, aspirations, and learning strategies; and (ii) changes in modifiable health-risk behaviors (i.e., physical activity, diet, smoking, and alcohol consumption).

METHODS/DESIGN: A two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial employing a wait-list control plus qualitative and mixed-method evaluations was used. Participants were school pupils from Years 7 and 8 (aged 11-13 years). Ten schools located in southwest England were randomly allocated to receive the BtBYCB intervention (n = 5 schools; 711 pupils) or a control condition (i.e., usual Personal, Social, and Health Education classes) (n = 5 schools; 622 pupils). Participants in the intervention condition received a program consisting of (i) a talk from an Olympian/Paralympian; (ii) 11 one-hour teacher-led PSHE classroom sessions in which pupils identified their aspirations, values, and interests and explored and acted on these via activities such as personal development planning, goal-setting, and peer-mentoring; and (iii) participated in a celebration event (e.g., second visit from Olympian/Paralympian and short individual presentations). Data were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and at 3-month follow-up.Focus groups (pupils and teachers) and individual interviews (headteachers) were conducted in the 5 intervention schools to (i) gain an in-depth understanding of mechanisms of change; (ii) explore ways in which the participants' motivation and engagement could be enhanced, and (iii) elicit user-feedback pertaining to how the program, content, and appeal could be improved.A mixed-method approach was used to describe and explain the differing experiences of particular groupings within and across the intervention schools; i.e., those for whom the program was effective, those that experienced little, if any change, and those for whom the program led to an inverse effect.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this work will provide insight into the effectiveness of an innovative and child-centered program. The research will inform improvements to the BtBYCB program as well as other interventions targeting child/youth health and wellness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered as Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN99443695.

摘要

背景

“成为最好的自己”(BtBYCB)计划是一项基于学校的干预措施,旨在通过赋予年轻人对自身发展的所有权,促进他们的身心健康和社会发展。本研究旨在确定 BtBYCB 计划对以下方面的有效性:(i)学生的幸福感、自我认知、自尊、志向和学习策略;以及(ii)可改变的健康风险行为的变化(即体育活动、饮食、吸烟和饮酒)。

方法/设计:采用两臂随机对照试验,采用等待名单对照和定性及混合方法评估。参与者为来自英格兰西南部的 7 至 8 年级(11-13 岁)的学生。10 所学校被随机分配接受 BtBYCB 干预(n=5 所学校;711 名学生)或对照组(即通常的个人、社会和健康教育课程)(n=5 所学校;622 名学生)。干预组的参与者接受了包括以下内容的计划:(i)奥运选手/残奥选手的演讲;(ii)11 次由教师主导的 PSHE 课堂会议,学生在会议中确定自己的志向、价值观和兴趣,并通过个人发展规划、设定目标和朋辈指导等活动探索和付诸行动;以及(iii)参加庆祝活动(例如,奥运选手/残奥选手的第二次访问和个人简短演讲)。在基线、干预后和 3 个月随访时收集数据。在 5 所干预学校进行了焦点小组(学生和教师)和个人访谈(校长),以(i)深入了解变化的机制;(ii)探索如何提高参与者的动机和参与度;以及(iii)征求有关如何改进计划、内容和吸引力的用户反馈。采用混合方法来描述和解释干预学校内和之间特定群体的不同体验;即,那些对计划有效的人、那些几乎没有变化的人以及那些对计划产生相反效果的人。

讨论

这项工作的结果将提供对一项创新的以儿童为中心的计划有效性的深入了解。这项研究将为 BtBYCB 计划以及其他针对儿童/青少年健康和幸福的干预措施的改进提供信息。

试验注册

该试验在当前对照试验 ISRCTN99443695 中注册。