• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于精神病学中使用的诊断分类和评定量表的相关性的说明。

A note on relevance of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry.

机构信息

Peking University, China.

出版信息

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013 Oct;112(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.05.016
PMID:23866997
Abstract

In the clinical practice of psychology and psychiatry, presence or absence of particular disorder or syndromes is based on the subjective interpretation of mental and behavioral descriptions offered by the patient. This is often done by questionnaires (also called instruments or scales) or by interviews. This subjectivity of the diagnostic decision-making process may limit the reliability of diagnosis. In the present study, a new method of scale relevance, based on double cluster analysis, is proposed as it is important to verify what we are trying to find with the proposed scale. If two data sets cluster differently, we must consider them as different.

摘要

在心理学和精神病学的临床实践中,特定障碍或综合征的存在与否是基于患者提供的心理和行为描述的主观解释。这通常通过问卷(也称为工具或量表)或访谈来完成。诊断决策过程的这种主观性可能会限制诊断的可靠性。在本研究中,提出了一种基于双重聚类分析的新量表相关性方法,因为验证我们试图用提出的量表找到什么是很重要的。如果两个数据集聚类不同,我们必须将它们视为不同的。

相似文献

1
A note on relevance of diagnostic classification and rating scales used in psychiatry.关于精神病学中使用的诊断分类和评定量表的相关性的说明。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013 Oct;112(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
2
Standardised rating scales in psychiatry: methodological basis, their possibilities and limitations and descriptions of important rating scales.精神病学中的标准化评定量表:方法学基础、其可能性与局限性以及重要评定量表的描述。
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10(1):6-26. doi: 10.1080/15622970802264606.
3
Improved statistical classification methods in computerized psychiatric diagnosis.计算机化精神疾病诊断中改进的统计分类方法。
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):95-103. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000112.
4
[Should diagnosis and classification be kept separate in psychiatry?].[在精神病学中,诊断和分类应该分开吗?]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(8):523-30.
5
Using survey results to improve the validity of the standard psychiatric nomenclature.利用调查结果提高标准精神科术语的效度。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;61(12):1188-94. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1188.
6
[Recent psychiatric classification systems and their significance for forensic psychiatry].[近期的精神疾病分类系统及其对法医精神病学的意义]
Gesundheitswesen. 1992 May;54(5):244-50.
7
Progress toward achieving a common language in psychiatry. Results from the field trial of the clinical guidelines accompanying the WHO classification of mental and behavioral disorders in ICD-10.在精神病学领域实现通用语言方面所取得的进展。世界卫生组织《国际疾病分类第10版:精神与行为障碍分类》临床指南现场试验的结果。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;50(2):115-24. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820140037004.
8
[The importance of classifications in psychiatry].[分类在精神病学中的重要性]
Encephale. 1995 Dec;21 Spec No 5:3-7.
9
[Toward the new classification of mental disorders--Polish psychiatrists' opinions about project of ICD-11].迈向精神障碍的新分类——波兰精神病学家对国际疾病分类第11版项目的看法
Psychiatr Pol. 2011 Nov-Dec;45(6):785-98.
10
Validity and utility of computer-based test interpretation.基于计算机的测试解释的有效性和实用性。
Psychol Assess. 2000 Mar;12(1):6-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Are There Any Gender Differences?炎症性肠病患者的抑郁和焦虑障碍:是否存在性别差异?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 29;20(13):6255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136255.
2
How to reduce the number of rating scale items without predictability loss?如何在不损失可预测性的情况下减少评定量表项目的数量?
Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):581-593. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2283-4. Epub 2017 Feb 16.