Wolpert Miranda
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Evidence Based Practice Unit (CAMHS EBPU), UCL and Anna Freud Centre, 21 Maresfield Gardens, London, NW3 5SU, UK,
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Mar;41(2):141-5. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0509-1.
Having been a national advocate for the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in the UK for the last decade, I have become increasingly concerned that unless the potential iatrogenic impact of widespread policy requirement for use of PROMs (Department of Health, Children and Young People's Health Outcomes Strategy, 2012) is recognised and addressed their real potential benefits (Sapyta et al., J Clin Psychol 61(2):145-153, 2005) may never be realized. Drawing on examples from PROMs implementation in CAMHS in the UK (Wolpert et al., J Ment Health 21(2):165-173, 2012a; Child Adolesc Mental Health 17(3):129-130, 2012b). I suggest key ways forward if PROMs are to support best clinical practice rather than undermine it.
在过去十年里,我一直是英国儿童和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)中使用患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的全国倡导者。我越来越担心,除非认识到并解决广泛的政策要求使用PROMs(卫生部,《儿童和青少年健康成果战略》,2012年)可能产生的潜在医源性影响,否则其真正的潜在益处(萨皮塔等人,《临床心理学杂志》61(2):145 - 153,2005年)可能永远无法实现。借鉴英国CAMHS中PROMs实施的例子(沃尔珀特等人,《心理健康杂志》21(2):165 - 173,2012a;《儿童与青少年心理健康》17(3):129 - 130,2012b)。我提出了如果PROMs要支持最佳临床实践而不是破坏它的关键前进方向。